After the highly expected weekend in which supporters of the bill expected some sort of an advancement, Eleanor Terrett reported that the White House has failed to respond to a key counterproposal.
The popular journalist noted a few days ago that Senator Thom Tillis and Senator Ruben Gallego had pushed for stronger ethics provisions, indicating that state attorneys general should enforce laws against federal officials.
However, she updated on Monday that the White House has failed to respond to the counterproposal after citing a source familiar with the matter.
“A deal on the CLARITY Act’s biggest outstanding issue has yet to materialize heading into the week of a potential vote,” she added.
The odds for approval of the legislation continue to decline as there’s no real progress made. Current data from Washington experts and prediction markets show that the percentage is down to 28%. It used to be at roughly 70% earlier this year.
The CLARITY Act: Crypto’s Final Window — Blockchain Interviews
Crypto Regulation · Special Report
The CLARITY Act’s
Window Is Closing
Majority Leader Thune has already conceded the bill won’t pass before the August 8 recess. With 10 days left and three disputes unresolved, Charles Hoskinson says the bill as written could kill the very industry it claims to protect — and he’s the one who’d benefit if it passed.
Published July 28, 2026
The clock has effectively run out. Senate Majority Leader John Thune has already told reporters the CLARITY Act will not pass before the August recess — which begins August 8, with August 7 the last working day. The Digital Asset Market Clarity Act sits on the Senate Legislative Calendar at No. 423, no cloture motion filed, three interlocking political disputes still unresolved, and the pre-recess window almost certainly closed before a vote can happen.
What remains is a narrow hope: that Thune can get the floor process started before recess, keeping a September comeback technically alive — though election politics, appropriations fights, and a Democratic Party that has grown increasingly hostile to the bill all make that a long shot. What happens in the next ten days, or fails to happen, will determine which cryptocurrency projects can raise money, get listed on exchanges, and build a user base in the United States — and which ones quietly move offshore.
The Legislative Record
How We Got Here
The House passed H.R. 3633 on July 17, 2025, by a 294–134 margin — a genuinely bipartisan result, with 78 Democrats joining every House Republican. The Senate Agriculture Committee approved its digital commodity version in January 2026. The Senate Banking Committee advanced its version on May 14, 2026, by a 15–9 vote. The bill landed on the full Senate calendar on June 1. Then Congress left for the July 4 recess with no floor vote scheduled and three disputes unresolved.
July 17, 2025
House passes CLARITY Act 294–134 with bipartisan support — 78 Democrats cross the aisle
January 2026
Senate Agriculture Committee passes its digital commodity version
May 14, 2026
Senate Banking Committee advances bill 15–9; two Democrats join but signal floor vote not guaranteed
June 1, 2026
Bill placed on Senate Legislative Calendar No. 423 — eligible for full floor consideration
July 4, 2026
Senate leaves for recess. No cloture filed. Three core disputes still unresolved
July 22, 2026
Sen. Lummis releases consolidated Senate draft merging Banking and Agriculture versions — new disputes immediately emerge
July 23, 2026
Thune tells reporters the CLARITY Act will not pass before August recess. White House crypto adviser Patrick Witt pushes back, calling the first week of August still viable
Now — July 28, 2026
Senate in session. Final window open in theory. No cloture motion filed. No floor time allocated
August 7, 2026
Last Senate working day before recess — the real deadline. Thune has already signaled this window will be missed
August 8, 2026
Senate August recess begins. Bill waits until mid-September — deep inside midterm election season
What’s At Stake
A $680 Billion Question
The total crypto market stood at roughly $2.28 trillion as of mid-July 2026. Bitcoin accounts for $1.29 trillion. Stablecoins represent another $305 billion, now governed by the Genius Act. The CLARITY Act is principally about the remaining $680 billion — altcoins, DeFi protocols, token issuances, and digital securities — and who regulates them, and how.
$2.28T
Total crypto market cap, July 2026
$680B
Assets directly in scope of CLARITY’s SEC/CFTC division
60
Senate votes required to clear the filibuster threshold
7–9
Democratic votes needed beyond the Republican base
The Three Disputes
What’s Actually Blocking the Vote
Republicans hold 53 Senate seats. Senators Josh Hawley and Rand Paul are expected to vote no on substantive grounds. That means the bill needs seven to nine Democratic votes to hit 60. Those votes are contingent on resolving three disputes that have dominated negotiations since spring.
Ethics Rules
Democrats are demanding restrictions on federal officials — including family members — participating in crypto markets. The Trump family’s exposure to Trumpcoin and World Liberty Finance makes this explosive for Republicans. A July 16 private meeting reportedly moved Trump to approve ethics language, but multiple Democrats say the restrictions still don’t go far enough.
Stablecoin Yields
Coinbase earns roughly $1.35 billion annually from USDC rewards. The Senate Banking draft prohibits yield on stablecoin holdings but allows rewards tied to transactions, payments, and loyalty programs. The line between those categories remains undrawn, and crypto firms argue the language protects incumbent banks at their expense.
Anti-Money Laundering
Law enforcement groups have pushed back on provisions they say could weaken their ability to track illicit crypto flows. A new illicit-finance framework from Sen. Lummis addresses crypto ATM fraud and suspicious-asset freezes, but the core Section 604 dispute has not been resolved.
Charles Hoskinson — Blockchain Interviews
The Loudest Warning in the Room
In a wide-ranging interview on Blockchain Interviews with Ashton Addison, Cardano and Midnight Network co-founder Charles Hoskinson offered the most pointed critique of the CLARITY Act to emerge from the builder class — and he was explicit that his warning is not self-interested. Under the bill’s current “mature blockchain” standard, Cardano, Ethereum, and Bitcoin would qualify as commodities. New projects would not.
From the Interview
“If this bill passes, you’re not going to be able to change it. The Democrats will have at some point the ability to weaponize it. And when they do, they can structure it in a way that every new project will always be a security. And if being a security is not a problem, then why is Brian Armstrong fighting so hard for his stable coin not to be?”
— Charles Hoskinson · Blockchain Interviews · July 2026
Hoskinson’s argument is structural, not tribal. He co-founded Ethereum. Cardano has been trading for years. Both would almost certainly pass the mature blockchain test in the bill’s current language. He has every financial incentive to stay quiet and let the bill pass. Instead, he has been vocal about a fundamental flaw: the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 — signed into law when FDR was president, when Hitler ran Germany — cannot be updated, and the CLARITY Act does not fix that. It works around it in ways that create a permanent tiered system.
“Under the old ambiguous way, we were winning court cases. XRP won its court case under the ambiguous laws. Under this law, if Ripple was founded today, XRP would be a security.”
— Charles Hoskinson
His prescription: update the definition of a security first. Create a concept of a decentralized digital security. Allow disclosure regimes that don’t require a centralized company to survive. Build in rulemaking flexibility so technology standards don’t need to be baked into statute. Globalize the process by engaging JFSA, MiCA regulators, and ADGM in parallel. None of that happened in the drafting process. What happened instead was a patronage system where proximity to the White House and ability to write large checks determined who shaped the text.
The Two Paths
Pass or Wait — Neither Is Clean
This is the uncomfortable arithmetic the industry is navigating in real time — and Thune’s public concession that the pre-recess window is likely lost has sharpened it considerably. The CLARITY Act is not a good bill, in Hoskinson’s telling. But the alternative to a bad bill passed now may be no bill until 2029 — by which point a Democratic-controlled Congress could produce something considerably more restrictive.
Galaxy Research — 2026 passage
50%Down from 75% post-committee markup
Polymarket — signed into law 2026
48%Down from 74% one month ago
If CLARITY Passes by August 7
CFTC gains full spot market authority over digital commodities
Crypto firms can raise up to $50M/year via simplified SEC registration
Exchanges face mandatory AML, KYC, and suspicious activity reporting
Stablecoin yield rules get codified — disputes move to rulemaking stage
BTC, ETH, ADA get commodity status confirmed under mature blockchain test
New projects face securities-by-default risk under the same test
Democrats retain weaponization pathway in a future administration
If CLARITY Misses the Window
No floor vote until mid-September at earliest — inside midterm season
September consumed by appropriations fights and election positioning
Democrats projected to gain House and Senate seats in November
New Congress in 2027 likely more hostile to crypto-friendly legislation
SEC rulemaking under Atkins remains operative — fragile but functional
Ambiguity persists — court cases remain the industry’s primary recourse
Comprehensive bill must be redrafted in 2029 at earliest
What CLARITY Actually Changes
The Mechanics of the Bill
Strip away the political noise and the CLARITY Act is primarily a jurisdictional reassignment. The SEC retains authority over investment contracts and tokenized securities. The CFTC — currently limited to crypto derivatives — gains full spot market authority over digital commodities. The CFTC currently employs 535 permanent staff on a $365 million budget; the SEC employs 4,101 on $2.15 billion. Giving the CFTC authority without commensurate resources is, critics note, a recipe for regulatory theater.
For token issuers, the bill creates a simplified SEC registration process allowing raises of up to $50 million per year and $200 million cumulatively. For DeFi, it establishes a framework for determining whether a protocol is genuinely decentralized — but the test is case-by-case, and legal uncertainty does not disappear. It relocates from Congress to the courts and to the rulemaking process.
The Path Not Taken
What Hoskinson Says Should Have Happened
In the interview, Hoskinson laid out in precise detail the legislative process that was skipped. Bring NIST into the room to define what a blockchain actually is. Engage JFSA, MiCA administrators, and ADGM in a Washington workshop so global regulatory frameworks could be cross-pollinated before the statute was drafted. Send questionnaires to every major segment of the industry — layer-ones, exchanges, wallet providers, DeFi protocols — and build a merit-based steering committee from the respondents. Run an interagency working group with SEC, CFTC, DOJ, and Treasury identifying their concerns in writing before any bill language was drafted.
From the Interview
“Almost every major nation has a full cryptocurrency regulatory framework for better or for worse. Not once did the process go to Europe and talk to the MiCA people. Not once did it go to Japan and talk to the JFSA. There are no fingerprints for this, and they’re about 5 to 10 years ahead of us.”
— Charles Hoskinson · Blockchain Interviews · July 2026
None of that was done. What happened was a process shaped by donors, run by a crypto czar with no prior legislative experience, that excluded Democrats from the beginning and produced a bill structurally good for incumbents and structurally hostile to new entrants. The result is a piece of legislation Hoskinson says he would benefit from — and is nonetheless opposing, on behalf of the builders who come after him.
What You Can Do
Self-Custody Is the Hedge Against All of This
Hoskinson’s prescription for ordinary crypto holders does not involve petitioning Congress. It involves embracing the protocols that can’t be legislated away. Self-custody. Non-custodial wallets. Moving assets into truly decentralized systems rather than ETFs, custodial accounts, or securitized products. The political cost of banning cryptocurrency scales with the number of people who hold it themselves. The ETF makes it easy for Congress to regulate the intermediary. The wallet in your pocket is harder to reach.
In the meantime, Midnight Network is building the privacy infrastructure he argues is the missing layer beneath all of this — zero-knowledge proofs, selective disclosure, decentralized identity — designed to work across Bitcoin, Ethereum, Cardano, and Solana alike. Not as a Cardano play. As the plumbing for whatever crypto looks like when the legislators are done arguing.
The Senate has until August 7. Thune has already said it won’t happen. Patrick Witt is still insisting the first week of August has potential. Watch for a cloture filing — that is the signal. If it doesn’t come before recess, the window slides to September, into midterm season, and the odds the industry is looking at today will look optimistic in hindsight.
Watch the Full Interview
Charles Hoskinson on Blockchain Interviews
Full Interview — Blockchain Interviews with Ashton Addison
Charles Hoskinson, co-founder of Ethereum and Cardano and founder of Midnight Network, speaks with Ashton Addison on the CLARITY Act, crypto privacy infrastructure, and why the bill as written could kill the next generation of American crypto projects.
ISSUE #12 · JULY 25, 2026
WEEKLY MARKETS & INTELLIGENCE
Issue #12
Ethereum Pushes Toward $2K as the CLARITY Act Clock Hits Its Final Days
Plus: Hoskinson says CLARITY could kill American crypto, Propr brings onchain prop trading to $1M in revenue, and XYO lands on Crypto.com.
August 7 Senate Deadline — Counting Down
Lead Story — Regulatory
The most important deadline in crypto right now isn’t a price level. It’s August 7.
That’s when the Senate leaves for summer recess, and if the CLARITY Act hasn’t passed by then, the window closes until at least 2027. At that point, lawmakers pivot to midterm campaigning, and comprehensive crypto market structure regulation gets pushed back years.
294‑134
House Vote (July 2025)
33%
Polymarket Odds
30%
Galaxy Research Est.
Here’s where things actually stand: the bill cleared the Senate Banking Committee 15‑9 in May. On July 22, Senator Lummis released a new merged draft combining both committee versions, including an ethics provision barring senior officials from issuing their own crypto — but with a 2029 sunset clause and DOJ-only enforcement. Democrats aren’t buying it.
⚠ Sens. Murphy, Van Hollen, and Merkley came out formally opposed on July 14, calling the bill “corrupt” and tied to Trump’s own crypto holdings. Republicans need 60 votes to break a filibuster, hold 53 seats, and Hawley and Paul are expected to vote no. Senate Majority Leader Thune says it may not get floor time before recess.
Prediction markets have moved with the mood. Polymarket has the odds down to 33%, and Galaxy Research just cut its estimate to 30%, down from the high‑30s a week ago. Industry groups including the Blockchain Association and the Digital Chamber are publicly pushing the Senate to act.
If it passes: clear rules on which tokens are commodities vs. securities, a CFTC registration path for exchanges, and regulatory certainty that brings institutional money off the sidelines. If it doesn’t: agencies keep running the show through guidance and enforcement while Congress resets after the midterms. Watch the next two weeks.
This Week on CCS — Interviews
Regulatory · Cardano
The Clarity Act Will KILL American Crypto — Here’s Why
Charles Hoskinson — Founder, Cardano & Midnight Network
Hoskinson breaks down exactly why he believes the CLARITY Act is dangerous for American crypto. He argues the bill creates a “security by default” framework that traps new projects under SEC jurisdiction, outlines the attack vectors regulators could exploit through rulemaking, and warns that implementation could take 15 years while entrenching incumbents and driving innovation offshore.
Onchain Crypto Prop Trading Is Here, and It’s Already Doing $1M in Revenue
Louis Régis — Founder, Propr
Louis Régis, a former Credit Suisse quant who ran the crypto desk at Rothschild & Co, is building fully onchain prop trading where every challenge, rule, and payout is settled onchain and publicly verifiable. Two months in: $1M in revenue, 5,000+ active traders, and 300+ AI agents trading with funded capital. He also covers Propr’s expansion to Polymarket — the first platform to bring funded capital to prediction markets.
Consolidating just above support. Daily flipped bullish, but Smart Money flow still OUT.
ETH/USDCautiously Bullish
Support $1,900
Resistance $1,944 → $2,011
Holding $1,937 pressing resistance zone. Daily + 3H both bullish. Smart Money shifting to BALANCED.
BITCOIN — ASHTON’S TAKE
Bitcoin’s momentum has been slow all through July. Price is consolidating just above $63,725 support, grinding sideways rather than trending. RSI sitting neutral in the high 40s isn’t giving a clear read in either direction. The 1D timeframe has flipped bullish — worth watching — but Smart Money flow is still OUT. This is a chop-and-wait setup, not a breakout.
What to watch: Whether $63,725 holds on a closing basis, and whether Smart Money flow flips to IN or BALANCED. That combination is what turns this from indecisive chop into a real push toward $66K.
Ethereum continues to be the standout, holding at $1,937.72 and pressing right up against the $1,944 to $2,011 resistance zone. The daily and 3H timeframes are both bullish — a real step up from Bitcoin’s setup. RSI neutral at 60.2, meaning there’s still room to run. Smart Money flow has shifted to BALANCED, an improvement from OUT.
What to watch: A confirmed close above $1,944. Clearing it with volume opens the door to $2,011, and $2,000 psychological territory becoming the floor instead of the ceiling.
Blockchain Futurist Conference returned home to Toronto for its 9th edition, bringing together 250+ speakers and thousands of attendees at the Rebel Entertainment Complex and Cabana Pool Bar — the largest Blockchain & AI event in Canada.
Over 60 sponsors were on site — Deloitte, KPMG, Wealthsimple, Polymath, and Robinhood — signaling how mainstream this space has become. Ashton sat down with Drew from Brave for a fireside chat covering Brave’s product roadmap, new BAT token integrations, and the Brave Wallet’s expansion to a physical card. Drew confirmed Brave has crossed 120 million users.
Next stop: Futurist Conference roadshow heads to Florida — November 17–18, 2026 at the Seminole Hard Rock Hotel & Casino in Hollywood, FL.
Presented by — Sponsor
🔗 XYO Network — The Original DePIN Protocol
10M+ nodes. A decade of proof-of-work. XYO’s Layer One is built for high-volume data, AI infrastructure, and real-world asset tokenization — with dual tokens $XYO and $XL1.
🔥 Big week for XYO: Crypto.com just listed both $XYO and $XL1, adding institutional-grade custody through Crypto.com Custody. The listing lands right after Crypto.com’s $20B valuation on a $400M raise backed by Citadel Securities — putting XYO alongside the traditional finance players moving into digital assets.
Weekly Signal Recap — Filtered for Signal, Not Noise
★★★
Bitcoin ETFs post ~$900M in inflows — largest week since May. BlackRock’s IBIT led with nearly $475M across the week. Institutional demand is back. But BTC dipped below $65K as the US escalated strikes on Iran and Brent crude surged past $100/barrel.
★★★
CLARITY Act has until August 7. Polymarket odds down to 33%, Galaxy Research cut to 30%. Sens. Murphy, Van Hollen, and Merkley formally opposed the July 22 draft. Thune says it may not get floor time before recess.
★★★
Crypto.com now lists $XYO and $XL1 (our sponsor XYO Network), adding institutional-grade custody. The move comes on the heels of Crypto.com’s $20B valuation and $400M raise with Citadel Securities — another sign of TradFi moving deeper into DePIN. Full story →
★★
Bitmine now holds 4.8% of all ETH supply and is targeting 5%. Tom Lee’s company owns ~5.78M ETH worth ~$10.9B. This week’s purchase was the smallest since launch, pivoting instead to share buybacks.
★★
Strategy raises $263.5M selling MSTR shares, bolsters USD Reserve to $3.2B. Michael Saylor’s pivot from pure Bitcoin accumulation to active treasury management continues to pressure the stock, now down 77%+ over the past year.
★★
Uniswap hits $4.5T in all-time protocol volume. Robinhood Chain crossed $6B in Uniswap volume including a $1B+ single day. New AI trading tools live: DCA bot, index rebalancer, and copy-trade wallet mirroring.
We need to keep this momentum going. Bitcoin holding its range and Ethereum pushing toward $2K is exactly the setup we want heading into the back half of the year — and a real breakout above $2K on ETH could pull the whole market deeper into a Q3 run.
But let’s not get ahead of ourselves. The CLARITY Act is shaping up to be a make-or-break event, and however the Senate lands on it in the next two weeks could be the thing that pushes this market decisively in one direction or the other.
Section 20216 of the latest CLARITY draft states that a self-custodied digital asset cannot become abandoned, unclaimed, or forfeited. It also cannot become subject to adverse possession or finder’s title solely because its owner has not moved it or otherwise shown continued interest.
The language overrides state and local laws that treat years of wallet inactivity alone as grounds for transferring ownership to someone else.
The May 8 and May 20 Senate drafts protected only the ability to hold a self-hosted wallet, and the July 22 version adds scope beyond that, extending into property law and covering whether a person still owns the coins inside that wallet once years of silence go by.
The section defines a self-custodied digital asset as one where the owner keeps exclusive control of the private keys without relying on a custodian, exchange or intermediary.
That definition draws the line the rest of the provision depends on.
Draft / provision
What it protects
What it does not fully settle
May 8 / May 20 Senate drafts
The ability to use a self-hosted wallet and hold private keys
Whether dormant self-custodied coins can be treated as abandoned property
July 22 Section 20216
Continued ownership of lawfully self-custodied digital assets
Claims based on more than inactivity, such as fraud, theft, competing ownership evidence, or court-specific facts
Custodial assets carveout
Preserves state unclaimed-property rules for exchanges, brokers, and custodians
Dormant assets held by intermediaries may still face state reporting and escheat rules
From wallet access to property title
Courts would have to draw a line between two categories of digital assets: coins a person controls directly through private keys and coins sitting with an exchange, broker, or custodian. The federal shield from the new CLARITY Act draft goes to the first group.
State unclaimed-property rules keep governing the second, since the draft expressly preserves them for custodial holdings. Recent state amendments already treat exchanges, custodians, and hosted-wallet providers as a distinct category for assets that could belong to missing owners.
A wallet holding its own keys and an exchange account holding the same dollar value in Bitcoin would sit on opposite sides of that line.
In the exchange case, the custodian controls the keys, so state dormancy, reporting, and delivery rules for that custodian keep applying the way they always have.
The case that made this provision urgent
New York’s own lost-property law shows why the provision has real teeth right now. Article 7-B of the state’s Personal Property Law covers property that someone loses and later turns over to police.
Section 257 lets title vest in the finder under specific conditions, including for property under $10 once a year of failed efforts to find the owner has gone by.
Noah Doe and two companies are using that framework to claim title to 39,069 dormant Bitcoin addresses holding roughly 3.799 million BTC, nearly 18% of Bitcoin’s total supply. Their filing points to an OP_RETURN notice campaign, a press release, and a claim window as evidence that the coins count as lost property nobody came forward to reclaim.
The theory leans hard on the wallets’ silence, years of coins sitting untouched with no owner surfacing to contest the claim, and Section 20216 targets that mechanism. A claimant could no longer point to years of inactivity or a lack of communication as the basis for taking title under state abandoned-property law.
Noah Doe’s plaintiffs also cite police reports, the OP_RETURN notices, and their attempts to contact possible owners. That evidence goes beyond pure dormancy, and it could let them argue their claim rests on more than silence alone even if CLARITY becomes law.
The provision closes the legal opening their case is testing without settling the lawsuit itself, since a court still has to weigh whether that additional evidence moves the analysis.
Section 20216 protects self-custodied assets from inactivity-based abandonment claims while leaving custodial holdings potentially subject to state unclaimed-property laws.
Where the provision goes from here
In the bull case, Section 20216 survives Senate negotiation with its preemption language intact, and courts read the phrase “solely due to inactivity” narrowly enough to give self-custody real protection.
Dormancy-based theories like the one behind Noah Doe become far harder to build, since a claimant would need proof beyond years of silence to get anywhere. Holding your own keys gains a legal backing that self-custody advocates have never quite had before.
In the bear case, Senate negotiators strip or soften Section 20216 before a final vote, and whatever language survives leaves room for courts to weigh inactivity alongside other factors when deciding a claim.
State-law experiments around dormant wallets stay possible, and a future claimant could still build a theory similar to Noah Doe’s around long stretches of silence plus a notice campaign.
Scenario
What happens to Section 20216
Effect on dormant-wallet claims
What it means for self-custody
Strong version survives
Federal preemption remains intact, and courts read “solely due to inactivity” narrowly.
Dormancy-only claims become very hard to bring
Self-custody gains a property-law shield, not just a technical right
Softened version passes
Language is narrowed, or exceptions expand
Claimants can still combine inactivity with notices or other evidence
Courts decide case by case whether silence supports abandonment
Provision removed
CLARITY keeps wallet-use protections but drops title protection
State-law experiments continue
Self-custody remains legal, but dormant-title risk stays unresolved
Court rules before law passes
Noah Doe or a similar case creates precedent first
Congress may need to clarify retroactivity and state-law preemption
Dormant Bitcoin becomes a national property-law issue
Self-custody keeps its protection as an activity; holding your own keys stays legal, and title during years of inactivity stays a live issue courts have to settle case by case.
Section 20216 removes the single easiest argument a claimant could make against a silent Bitcoin address: the idea that years of nothing happening amounts to abandonment on its own. Whether that turns out to be enough depends on what survives Senate negotiation and what a judge eventually decides silence alone can prove.
Bitcoin is entering the second half of the year with its support system, which powered its last rally, under pressure.
Data from CryptoSlate shows that the largest digital asset has fallen about 33% this year and more than 50% from its October record high above $126,000, trading near its weakest level since September 2024 at around $58,600 as of press time.
Bitcoin Price Performance in H1 2026 (Source: Tradingview)
That makes July a test of whether the market is nearing exhaustion or beginning another leg lower. The next four weeks bring three pressure points: whether exchange-traded fund outflows slow, whether the Federal Reserve signals another rate increase, and whether Congress can move the CLARITY Act before the August recess.
The outcome could determine whether Bitcoin rebounds toward $100,000 by year-end or retests the $50,000 to $55,000 area, which analysts now see as the next major structural support zone.
ETF demand has flipped from cushion to pressure
ETF flows have become one of the clearest signs that Bitcoin’s institutional support is weakening.
Data from SoSoValue show US spot Bitcoin ETFs posted about $4.5 billion in net outflows in June, their worst month since the products began trading in January 2024.
BlackRock’s IBIT accounted for most of the withdrawals, underscoring how the largest regulated demand channel for Bitcoin has become a source of sustained selling pressure.
The weakness was spread across the month rather than concentrated in a single trading session. Spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded only three days of inflows in June, with those positive days totaling less than $100 million combined.
Bitcoin ETFs Daily Flows in June 2026 (Source: SoSoValue)
The rest of the month was dominated by redemptions, including several sessions in which hundreds of millions of dollars left the products.
That pressure followed Bitcoin below the $60,000 area and challenged one of the central assumptions behind the ETF-led phase of the market: that regulated funds would provide a steadier base of demand during drawdowns.
Ecoinometrics, a Bitcoin analysis platform, said the decline was consistent with the pressure visible in fund flows, noting that:
“Bitcoin below $60K shouldn’t surprise anyone watching ETF flows. The last 30 days have seen some spectacular days of selling. But they’ve really been defined by relentless selling.”
The firm said nearly every recent trading session had seen capital exit spot Bitcoin ETFs, creating one of the most persistent stretches of outflows since the funds launched. It added:
“That’s the kind of demand shock that keeps pushing prices lower.”
However, the withdrawals do not necessarily point to panic selling.
This is because many ETF investors entered the market at lower prices and may be taking profits or cutting exposure after Bitcoin’s sharp advance last year. But the persistence of the outflows shows that institutional investors are not yet stepping in to absorb the decline.
That marks a clear shift from the earlier stage of the cycle, when ETF demand helped pull Bitcoin deeper into mainstream portfolios and supplied a visible stream of new capital. In June, the same structure showed how quickly large allocators can retreat when prices weaken, macro conditions tighten and momentum fades.
The market is now treating ETF flows as a better gauge of confidence in the top crypto.
So, a return to steady inflows would suggest institutional buyers are willing to rebuild exposure after the drawdown.
But continued redemptions would leave Bitcoin more dependent on long-term holders and less protected by Wall Street demand heading into the second half of the year.
The Fed has removed the rate-cut trade
The ETF retreat is happening just as the rate-cut narrative that carried much of the early-year optimism has broken down.
The Federal Reserve held interest rates steady at its June meeting, but the decision itself was not the market-moving part. The tone was.
Under Chair Kevin Warsh, policymakers have shifted toward a more hawkish stance as inflation remains above target and tariff-related price pressure continues to show up in consumer data.
That has forced traders to reprice the second half of the year. Rate relief, which many crypto investors expected to arrive under a Trump-appointed Fed chair, is no longer the base case. Markets are now considering the possibility that the next move could be a hike rather than a cut.
That shift matters for Bitcoin because the asset does not pay yield.
When Treasury yields rise and the dollar strengthens, investors have less incentive to hold assets whose value depends heavily on liquidity expectations. Bitcoin is absorbing that pressure even as its ETF channel sees redemptions.
The Fed’s change in tone also undercuts one of the market’s earlier assumptions about Warsh. Many crypto investors expected him to lean dovish because President Donald Trump had long pushed for lower rates.
However, that expectation was never as firm as the market treated it. Surveys had suggested only a narrow lean toward dovishness on rates, while many investors expected Warsh to take a tougher stance on the Fed’s balance sheet and preserve some independence from the White House.
The June meeting forced a reset. In March, policymakers were still leaning toward one or two cuts by year-end. By June, the median projection had shifted toward a possible hike, even though the committee remained divided.
That leaves Bitcoin without the macro support many investors expected heading into the summer.
Financial conditions are not easing, the dollar has firmed, and Treasury yields have moved back toward recent highs. For an asset still treated by many allocators as a high-beta liquidity trade, that is a difficult backdrop.
Strategy’s shift raises questions over BTC treasury demand
Meanwhile, market pressure has also spread to the corporate Bitcoin treasury trade, where Strategy’s first sale in years drew attention well beyond the transaction’s size.
Strategy (formerly MicroStrategy) disclosed in May that it sold 32 Bitcoins, worth about $2.5 million. The sale represented only a small fraction of its holdings and did little to alter the company’s overall exposure.
However, the larger concern was the signal it sent to a market that has long viewed Strategy as Bitcoin’s most committed corporate buyer.
For much of the cycle, Strategy stood for a straightforward trade: raise capital, buy Bitcoin and hold through volatility. That made the company an important reference point for investors, especially as spot ETF inflows and corporate treasury purchases reinforced each other.
The company later reinforced that shift, saying it could sell part of its Bitcoin holdings to strengthen its balance sheet, support its perpetual preferred securities and fund stock repurchases.
The statement gave investors a clearer view of how management could balance Bitcoin exposure against liquidity needs, financing costs and shareholder returns.
Strategy remains closely tied to Bitcoin. Its holdings remain large, and one small sale after years of purchases does not change the market’s supply balance.
Still, the company’s new flexibility has raised a broader question of whether Bitcoin treasury companies will continue to act as steady buyers if prices remain weak and funding conditions tighten.
That question has become more important as Strategy adjusts its financing structure, dividend commitments and reserve policy.
The framework could make the company more resilient by improving liquidity and reducing balance-sheet strain. It also gives management more room to prioritize financial discipline over constant Bitcoin purchases.
For a market already under pressure from ETF outflows, the shift adds another source of uncertainty. Stable corporate holders could help absorb weakness. Slower buying or further deleveraging would remove part of the demand base that supported Bitcoin’s previous advance.
Over the past year, hedge funds, asset managers and wealth advisers have poured into AI-linked stocks as investors search for exposure to one of the fastest-growing themes in global markets.
The demand has spilled into new listings, derivatives and exchange-traded products tied to companies seen as beneficiaries of the AI buildout.
That appetite has kept risk-taking alive across parts of Wall Street. But much of the money is moving toward chipmakers, data-center operators, software companies and other firms with a clearer earnings link to AI infrastructure, rather than into crypto.
The split complicates Bitcoin’s market signal. Its decline is not due to investors abandoning risk altogether. Capital is still moving into speculative areas, but Bitcoin is no longer the main destination.
AI offers investors a more immediate corporate growth story as large technology companies continue to spend heavily on chips, cloud capacity and data centers.
Bitcoin, by contrast, is entering the second half of the year with weaker ETF flows, policy uncertainty and renewed questions about corporate treasury demand.
That divergence has left Bitcoin outside a rally in other high-growth assets. If AI continues to absorb capital through the summer, Bitcoin may need a stronger catalyst than lower prices to regain investor attention.
CLARITY Act becomes July’s policy catalyst
After a first half shaped by ETF outflows, renewed rate pressure and questions over corporate Bitcoin buyers, the Senate calendar has become one of crypto’s few near-term openings for a shift in sentiment.
The CLARITY Act would create a federal market structure framework for digital assets and define the roles of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).
Its passage would give exchanges, banks, asset managers and token issuers a clearer basis for building products and expanding services in the US.
A delay or failure would leave the industry facing the same regulatory uncertainty that has weighed on investment, product development and market confidence for years.
The timing is tight because US Senate leaders have only a narrow window before the August recess, while lawmakers still need to reconcile committee versions, address Democratic concerns over ethics and illicit-finance provisions, and secure enough votes to move the bill through the chamber.
That makes July a key test for the market. If the bill advances, Bitcoin could gain a policy catalyst at a time when ETF redemptions and macro conditions are weighing on risk appetite.
However, if the effort slips into the fall, one of the clearest sources of potential positive sentiment in the second half would fade.
In view of this, Thomas Perfumo, Kraken’s Chief Economist, described the CLARITY Act as the catalyst to watch over the next four weeks, saying passage could help restore sentiment and momentum.
Bitcoin’s Potential Price Path if CLARITY is Passed (Source: Grayscale)
Notably, Grayscale has also tied the bill to Bitcoin’s near-term path, placing it alongside Strategy’s balance-sheet decisions and the Fed’s rate outlook as factors that could determine whether BTC is nearing a low or remains exposed to further losses.
Senator Cynthia Lummis told Fox Business on June 24 that negotiators expect final Senate compromise language around the July 4 recess and then plan to “move in July,” the most public deadline any sponsor has set for a bill that cleared the Senate Banking Committee in May.
The declaration came before Senate Majority Leader John Thune had announced floor time, before a final Senate floor package had been published, and before the ethics dispute that derailed a key negotiating meeting on June 9 had been resolved.
The calendar problem
The Senate enters a state work period from June 29 to July 10, and another one begins Aug. 10 and runs through Sept. 11.
That leaves a mid-to-late July window of roughly four weeks, and Stifel’s chief Washington policy strategist Brian Gardner wrote that CLARITY probably needs to clear the Senate by the end of July, adding that failure before the August recess would materially deteriorate the bill’s prospects.
A timeline shows the CLARITY Act’s narrow July 11–Aug. 9 Senate floor-action window, bracketed by a June 29–July 10 state work period and an Aug. 10 recess.
Galaxy Research put 2026 passage odds at roughly 50-50, treating the August recess as the last realistic legislative gate. Polymarket traders have priced 2026 passage near 48%, down from 74% a month ago.
Lummis has framed the stakes in generational terms, warning that missing this window would delay meaningful market structure legislation until 2030, after midterms reshape the chamber.
That warning now doubles as a recruitment pitch to Thune: allocate July floor time or explain to the crypto industry why the bill that passed the House 294-134 in July 2025 died on the Senate calendar.
What the committee’s vote left open
Democrats Ruben Gallego of Arizona and Angela Alsobrooks of Maryland joined all 13 Republicans to advance the bill, stating that their committee votes reflected conditional support, with floor backing contingent on resolving outstanding issues that have stayed open since May.
The June 9 ethics meeting among senators, including Gallego, Alsobrooks, and Lummis, alongside White House Crypto Council Executive Director Patrick Witt, broke down without agreement after Republicans and the White House withdrew a provision that would have authorized state attorneys general to sue the Justice Department over failures to enforce ethics rules tied to President Donald Trump’s crypto business interests.
Democrats have also raised AML provisions and the question of whether crypto companies should face bank-equivalent capital and consumer protection obligations if they offer deposit-like products.
Lummis disclosed that the bill carries $150 million in dedicated funding to combat illicit crypto activity, a provision designed to answer the AML objection directly.
Whether that concession moves conditional Democrats to firm floor commitments is the operative question going into July.
Requirement
Current status in the article
Why it matters
Final text
Expected around July 4 recess, but not yet released
Senators cannot fully commit until the compromise language is visible
Thune floor time
Lummis says she is working with leadership, but no slot has been announced
A bill can be viable and still die without floor time
60-vote coalition
GOP needs at least seven Democrats
Committee support does not equal cloture support
Gallego / Alsobrooks support
Both backed committee passage conditionally
Their final stance is the first test of Democratic durability
Ethics language
June 9 talks broke down without agreement
Unresolved ethics disputes can give Democrats a reason to hold back
AML / bank-like product concerns
Lummis points to $150M illicit-finance funding and Section 301 revisions
These are the main substantive objections being answered before July
House/Senate alignment
Senate changes may require House action
Even Senate passage may not be the final step
Why Dimon became part of the push
Dimon argued in a Fox Business interview that CLARITY could allow crypto companies to offer rewards resembling interest-bearing deposits without bank-equivalent regulation, and that the bill inadequately addressed AML and Bank Secrecy Act requirements.
Lummis rejected both claims on Fox Business, saying Dimon is “mistaken” and should read the bill over the July 4 recess.
She pointed to revised Section 301, which allows rewards programs but bars benefits tied directly to account balances in a way that replicates traditional bank interest.
Banking sector opposition gives wavering Democrats a respectable reason to hold back, and Lummis is answering JPMorgan’s specific objections before senators go home, making it harder for a Democrat to cite Dimon as grounds for withholding a floor vote.
A letter released by the Blockchain Association and signed by 160 former national security, intelligence, and law enforcement professionals, urging Thune and Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer to advance the bill, adds a national-security frame aimed at the same audience: shrinking the political space for opposition before the recess window closes.
Two outcomes
If Thune schedules July floor time and the ethics language finds a formulation that keeps Gallego and Alsobrooks on board, CLARITY moves to a cloture vote that tests whether five more Democrats are genuinely in range.
A clean floor path through July would require Agriculture Committee reconciliation and House action on any Senate changes before a presidential signature, and clearing those steps would confirm that the 2026 window is real.
The CLARITY Act’s fate hinges on July floor time: the yes path requires seven Democratic votes; the no path ends at August recess.
Exchanges, token issuers, and asset managers awaiting SEC/CFTC jurisdictional clarity would receive a defined regulatory path by year-end.
If the ethics provision stays unresolved, Thune withholds floor time, or Democratic caveats harden through July, the bill slides into September with a fall calendar running toward November midterms.
Legislation becomes harder to schedule as elections approach, and the coalition that produced a 294-134 House vote and a 15-9 Senate committee vote would face a reconstituted Congress of unknown composition in 2027.
Lummis is saying “moving in July” on national television because that is where the political cost of inaction lands hardest, on Thune, on Democrats, and on the banking lobby simultaneously.
A July 4 target date for advancing crypto market-structure legislation through the Senate is now looking less certain, according to Galaxy Digital’s head of research.
Senate Calendar Creates A Bottleneck
Alex Thorn revised his probability estimate for the CLARITY Act passing in 2026 from 75% down to 60%, citing a Senate schedule that has grown increasingly crowded with competing priorities.
Next week’s agenda is expected to be taken up largely by FISA-related business following a failed reauthorization vote, leaving little room for crypto legislation to advance.
Thorn said the obstacle is no longer political will — support for the bill has not collapsed. The problem is time.
i just sent this note to clients lowering my odds of 2026 clarity act passage from 75% immediately post-markup to 60% today
i said in may that the senate calendar was one of the biggest hurdles, and that picture has worsened. last night the FISA reauth vote failed, so now next… pic.twitter.com/2EcxMb3Hwh
Two sticking points remain on the table: lawmaker ethics rules and illicit finance provisions tied to the bill. Neither has been resolved, and the lack of movement on both fronts has further complicated the path forward.
Despite the lowered odds, Thorn said he remains optimistic about the bill’s eventual chances — though he cautioned that the timeline is now more fluid than many had assumed.
The CLARITY Act is widely considered the most consequential crypto legislation currently before Congress. Its central aim is to settle a long-running dispute between the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Commodity Futures Trading Commission over who regulates what in the digital asset space.
Under the proposal, tokens classified as commodities would fall under CFTC oversight, while those deemed securities would stay with the SEC — a distinction that would reshape how exchanges operate and what compliance requirements apply to crypto projects.
Supporters say federal clarity on those boundaries would cut regulatory uncertainty and keep crypto development from migrating abroad.
A Window That May Be Closing
Senator Cynthia Lummis had previously pointed to July 4 as a marker for getting market-structure legislation moving in the Senate.
Thorn’s revised figure puts pressure on that informal target. His assessment reflects scheduling constraints, not a shift in how lawmakers view the bill itself.
For crypto stakeholders awaiting regulatory certainty, the revised outlook points to a potentially longer path toward comprehensive legislation.
Featured image from Unsplash, chart from TradingView
Crypto pundit Ash Crypto has drawn attention to speculations about how institutions could be crashing the Bitcoin price on purpose. This comes as the Bitcoin ETFs continue to record massive outflows, which have caused this latest decline for the leading crypto.
Pundit Highlights Speculations Of Institutions Purposely Crashing Bitcoin Price
In an X post, Ash Crypto claimed there were rumors that institutions are purposely crashing the Bitcoin price so they can buy at lower prices before the Clarity Act is signed into law. The pundit noted that a similar pattern had played out in August 2022, when BlackRock filed for a private Bitcoin trust, and BTC later dropped about 36% before forming a bottom.
Following that, BlackRock then filed for a spot Bitcoin ETF, and the Bitcoin price later surged by 95%. Ash Crypto noted that BTC hit a new high in January 2024, when spot ETFs were approved. He added that insider institutions are repeating the same strategy with the Clarity Act narrative.
The Bitcoin ETFs have largely contributed to the decline in the Bitcoin price, with these funds recording outflows in 13 out of the last 14 trading days. During this period, their total net assets have dropped from around $104 billion to $82 billion. Strategy co-founder Michael Saylor also cited these outflows in his comments on the BTC crash.
In an X post, Saylor said that the capital markets are funding the AI buildout at a historic scale, with $400 billion deployed over six months, while BTC ETFs have seen $4 billion in outflows since May 14, pressuring the Bitcoin price. He declared that this is a capital rotation, not a BTC impairment, while adding that volatility creates opportunity.
BTC Simply Following The Four-Year Cycle
Crypto analyst Benjamin Cowen has reiterated that the Bitcoin price is simply following the four-year cycle. He also mentioned that the bull case for BTC is that if the economy is still doing well after the four-cycle low is put in, then it should have no problem starting its next bull market. Based on historical trends, the bear cycle low could happen by the fourth quarter of this year.
Meanwhile, Cowen noted that midterm years always feel really bad for crypto, and that this one is even worse, since the Bitcoin price topped on apathy. He opined that Bitcoin will survive, although many crypto assets may die out. Crypto analyst Ali Martinez warned that BTC is not looking good at the moment and that the leading crypto could drop to the next major area of support between $54,000 and $50,000.
At the time of writing, the Bitcoin price is trading at around $63,100, down in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.
JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon said US banks “will not accept” the current draft of the CLARITY Act. He vowed the industry will fight the bill, escalating a public clash with Coinbase.
At the Reagan National Economic Forum on Friday, Dimon attacked a CLARITY Act provision. The clause lets crypto firms pay interest-like rewards on stablecoin balances without bank-style consumer protections.
Banks ‘Will Fight’ the CLARITY Act
Dimon framed the dispute as a fairness issue. He argued any firm taking deposits should face the same capital, liquidity, and reporting requirements as regulated lenders.
“If he takes deposits like a bank, should have bank rules … If you want to be a bank, be a bank,” Dimon stated in an interview with Fox Business.
The CEO said the American Bankers Association, smaller banks, and credit unions all oppose the current text.
“It will be fought. Don’t bow down to this guy or company.”
“I am not that worried about stablecoin. I would have nothing to do with it. Would blow up on its own.”
The bill is heading for markup in Congress. The dispute now pits Wall Street’s largest bank against the largest US crypto exchange. Dimon said his ask is simple.
The Senate Banking Committee voted 15-9 on Thursday to move forward on the CLARITY Act, a crypto market structure proposal that has been the subject of debate for a while now.
Nevertheless, just ahead of the vote, the Bank Policy Institute (BPI) put out a series of tweets on X about illicit crypto flows hitting $154 billion in 2025, adding another dimension to what was already an intensely debated topic on the extent of regulation in digital assets.
Bank Advocates Lean on Crime Data
The timing of BPI’s thread drew attention because lawmakers were simultaneously debating amendments tied to stablecoin yield restrictions and enforcement standards inside the CLARITY Act markup session.
According to data from Chainalysis that the institute shared, in 2025, illicit crypto addresses received $154 billion. This was a 162% year-over-year increase, driven largely by a 694% jump in value received by sanctioned entities.
Furthermore, the on-chain money laundering ecosystem grew from $10 billion in 2020 to over $82 billion in 2025, with stablecoins, primarily Tether (USDT), now accounting for 84% of all illicit transaction volume, displacing Bitcoin as the preferred payment method for criminals.
In a separate piece, the BPI argued that banks have spent decades staffing tens of thousands of AML employees while crypto companies have been largely exempt.
It said that the GENIUS Act imposed some obligations on US stablecoin issuers, but did not cover foreign issuers operating stateside. Tether, incorporated in El Salvador, sits outside that net.
The piece also cited the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, whose crypto activity reportedly reached over $3 billion in 2025, representing roughly 50% of Iran’s total crypto ecosystem by Q4 of that year.
According to the BPI, unhosted wallets, cross-chain bridges, and mixers are “specifically designed to frustrate tracing and openly advertised as such.”
The stablecoin debate has become one of the most contentious parts of the CLARITY Act negotiations, with banking groups, including members of the American Bankers Association, spending weeks lobbying senators to tighten language restricting yield-bearing stablecoins.
As CryptoPotato reported earlier this week, banking groups sent Senate offices more than 8,000 letters ahead of the markup vote, while the crypto advocacy group Stand With Crypto said its supporters had contacted lawmakers nearly 1.5 million times in support of the bill.
But despite more than 40 amendments proposed by Senator Elizabeth Warren and procedural disputes during the hearing, the legislation advanced with support from Democratic senators Ruben Gallego and Angela Alsobrooks.
The Counter-Argument
While the BPI is demanding stricter anti-money laundering laws and sanctions regulations to be applied to crypto the same way it has been done to the traditional banking sector, data shared by Binance Research on May 14, offered some pushback to its claims.
According to Binance, trapped illicit funds on-chain have grown every year because less is being successfully laundered, not more.
Their report showed that more exit points are being blocked by KYC and more balances are being frozen by stablecoin issuers. Even the largest mixers have been processing at most $10 million per day.