Menu
MCAP $2.92T ▼-2.68%
BTC $85,501 ▼-0.16%
ETH $2,691 ▼-0.71%
BNB $780.75 ▼-0.82%
XRP $1.500 ▲+0.38%
SOL $120.80 ▲+0.60%
DOGE $0.0943 ▼-0.64%
ADA $0.272 ▲+2.45%
TRX $0.3361 ▼-0.20%
LINK $13.96 ▲+0.49%
AVAX $11.47 ▲+5.26%
HYPE $91.86 ▼-1.19%
DOT $1.220 ▲+0.52%

CLARITY Act

Every Crypto Coin Show story tagged CLARITY Act, newest first, alongside the guides and interviews that give it context.

Guide: Stablecoin yield vs tokenized money marketGuide: Perpetual futures, funding rates and liquidations,Newsletter
From the interview archive
Fairshake backs six House members with $1 million each in 32-race push
Legal & Crime

Fairshake backs six House members with $1 million each in 32-race push

, , , , , , ,

Legal & CrimeCrypto Coin Show News Team·October 6, 2026·3 min read

Fairshake, the crypto industry’s largest political action committee, is giving $1 million each to six House members as part of a 32-race spending campaign ahead of the 2026 midterms. The push lands alongside a CoinShares survey showing regulation remains the top worry for institutional investors managing $1.16 trillion in assets, even as digital asset allocations rose for the first time since October 2025.

  • Fairshake is donating $1 million each to three Republicans and three Democrats on House Financial Services, part of spending across 32 races.
  • The PAC held $108 million in cash on hand at the end of August and says it won 53 of 57 races it entered this cycle.
  • CoinShares’ August survey of 30 managers overseeing $1.16 trillion found allocations rose to 1.2%, driven entirely by institutional rotation.
  • $108M Fairshake’s cash reserve versus its $30M push against Sherrod Brown
  • 1.2% average portfolio allocation to digital assets, up from last quarter’s sell-off low
  • 22% 30-day bitcoin volatility, near its record low despite investor fear

Fairshake PAC said Monday (October 5) it will give $1 million each to six House members, split evenly between parties, as part of a wider effort touching 32 campaigns, the group told Roll Call. The spending push, first detailed by Cryptopolitan, pairs PAC money with voter mobilization from a separate Coinbase-backed group as Washington’s crypto market-structure bill sits stalled.

The Senate blocked that bill, known as the Clarity Act, on a bipartisan procedural vote last month, after the House passed it in July 2025. Lawmakers could not agree on ethics safeguards meant to prevent officials from enriching themselves through crypto ventures.

Fairshake Backs French Hill, Bryan Steil and Four Others With $1M Checks

The six recipients include Financial Services Committee Chair French Hill of Arkansas, digital-assets subcommittee Chair Bryan Steil of Wisconsin, and committee Vice Chair Bill Huizenga of Michigan. The three Democrats are Janelle Bynum of Oregon, Steven Horsford of Nevada, and Derek Tran of California, all of whom backed the Clarity Act when the House split 78-134 on the July 2025 vote.

Fairshake’s broader list runs to 19 Republicans and 13 Democrats, including Democratic Caucus Chair Pete Aguilar, Budget ranking member Brendan Boyle and Ways and Means Chairman Jason Smith. The PAC’s largest donors trace back to Coinbase, Ripple and venture firm Andreessen Horowitz, and the group separately plans to spend $30 million against former Senator Sherrod Brown’s Ohio campaign.

We back pro-crypto candidates who support American innovation in both parties. We’ve won 53 of the 57 races we engaged in this cycle and look forward to continuing to build on the largest pro-crypto caucus in American history.

Geoff Vetter, Fairshake spokesperson

Stand With Crypto Claims a 3 Million-Advocate Voter Network

Coinbase-backed group Stand With Crypto says it has built a network of more than 3 million registered advocates and supported 32 members of Congress who voted for the Clarity Act. Executive director Mason Lynaugh has framed the goal as proving crypto supporters are a voting bloc large enough to swing close races.

That voter base gives Fairshake’s money a delivery mechanism beyond television ads. Crypto, AI and online-betting firms together have become a growing force in midterm financing, with corporate political spending reaching $646 million this cycle, according to Public Citizen, of which $206 million came from crypto donors.

CoinShares: Regulation Still Tops the List for $1.16 Trillion in Managed Assets

CoinShares’ August survey of 30 fund managers found digital asset allocations climbed to 1.2% of portfolios, the first increase since the October 2025 sell-off began. The move came entirely from institutional investors, who funded the shift by selling fixed income and commodities rather than adding fresh capital.

Regulation remains the top concern among those already invested, which CoinShares links directly to Clarity Act uncertainty, the same bill Fairshake’s spending is meant to revive. Ether’s growth outlook deteriorated sharply on both the bill’s delay and high turnover among senior Ethereum Foundation staff, while bitcoin held the top spot for growth outlook and respondents flagged rising interest in Zcash, HYPE and SUI. Volatility ranked as the leading barrier for uninvested managers even though 30-day volatility sits near a record low of 22%, which CoinShares attributes to drawdown fear rather than realized price swings, an area regulators are also probing through moves like the <a href

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

SEC proposes crypto custody framework as ninth federal action since August
Bitcoin

SEC proposes crypto custody framework as ninth federal action since August

, , , , , , , , ,

BitcoinCrypto Coin Show News Team·October 2, 2026·2 min read

The US Securities and Exchange Commission proposed a custody framework on Thursday (October 1) that would let registered investment advisers and regulated funds hold crypto assets, including through self-custody and state-chartered trust companies, for the first time under rules built specifically for the asset class. The proposal is the ninth US regulatory action on crypto since mid-August, a run that has moved from how tokens are sold to how they are held, even as Congress remains stalled on the market-structure bill that would settle jurisdiction between the SEC and CFTC.

  • The SEC’s Oct. 1 proposal would permit crypto self-custody “under certain circumstances” and recognize state trust companies as custodians for client and fund assets.
  • It is the ninth federal crypto action since Aug. 18, following the Senate’s 49-50 failed cloture vote on the CLARITY Act on Sept. 15, ten votes short of the 60 needed.
  • The CFTC’s broader market-structure framework, covering secondary trading, has sat at the White House’s Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs since Sept. 17 with its text still unpublished.
  • 60 days comment window on the SEC’s custody proposal once published in the Federal Register
  • 49-50 Senate cloture vote on CLARITY Act, ten votes short of the 60-vote threshold
  • 1.2% digital-asset allocation share in CoinShares’ August survey, first rise since the October 2025 selloff

The Securities and Exchange Commission said in its proposal that it wants to “modernize custody rules and expand investor choice” by removing barriers that currently keep advisers from offering crypto-related advice. The rules, proposed under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and the Investment Company Act of 1940, would also update financial-statement audit requirements for advisers and broker-dealer custodial arrangements for regulated funds. Crypto Coin Show covered the earlier stage of this custody rule as the agency signaled the change was coming.

SEC Chairman Atkins Calls Rule a ‘Compliant Pathway Where None Existed Before’

SEC Chairman Paul Atkins framed the proposal as closing a gap that has existed since crypto moved from fringe asset to institutional holding. He said regulators had not kept pace with an asset class that has grown “from a niche curiosity into a multi-trillion-dollar asset class to which investors actively seek exposure.”

Today’s proposal would provide a clear regulatory framework for the custody of crypto assets, giving investment advisers and funds a compliant pathway where none existed before, and replacing the grey of uncertainty created by custody rules crafted for a bygone era.

Paul S. Atkins, SEC Chairman

The proposal is not final. Comments run 60 days from the proposing release’s publication in the Federal Register, a window roughly double the 30 days the agency gave on some earlier crypto proposals this cycle.

Self-Custody Provision Breaks From Decades-Old Qualified Custodian Rule

For registered investment advisers, custody of client assets has historically required a “qualified custodian,” typically a bank or registered broker-dealer, a standard written before crypto existed and widely seen as incompatible with how digital assets are actually held and transferred. The new framework would let advisers rely on self-custody “under certain circumstances” and would add state trust companies as an eligible custodian category, broad

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

Citi backs Coinbase stablecoin paying 3.75% yield weeks after its trade group opposed rewards
Institutional

Citi backs Coinbase stablecoin paying 3.75% yield weeks after its trade group opposed rewards

, , , , , , , ,

Editor's ChoiceCrypto Coin Show News Team·September 28, 2026·3 min read

Citi is now the banking rail behind a Coinbase stablecoin product that pays 3.75% a year in rewards, the exact kind of yield that Citi CEO Jane Fraser’s own trade group asked the Senate to ban weeks earlier. The partnership, unveiled as the Clarity Act’s stablecoin provisions lie dormant after a failed Senate vote, shows how far bank-crypto integration has moved even as the rulebook for it remains unwritten.

  • Eight banking trade groups, including the Financial Services Forum chaired by Citi CEO Jane Fraser, sent a joint letter asking the Senate to ban stablecoin rewards.
  • The Clarity Act failed a Senate procedural vote 49-50 on September 15, 2026, eleven votes short of the 60 needed.
  • Citi and Coinbase’s new corporate checkout and account product, announced September 28, 2026, routes stablecoin payments through Citi while paying depositors 3.75% annually.
  • 49-50 Senate procedural vote tally, 11 short of the 60-vote threshold
  • 3.75% annual reward rate on the Citi-backed Coinbase stablecoin account
  • Sept 15 banking letter sent, 13 days before the Citi-Coinbase deal was announced

Eight U.S. banking trade associations, including the Financial Services Forum, told senators in a joint letter that “when deposits decline, it reduces the availability of credit that supports communities and pathways to upward mobility.” The Financial Services Forum’s chair is Citi CEO Jane Fraser, according to the Forum’s own leadership page.

Thirteen days later, on Monday (September 28, 2026), Citi and Coinbase announced a partnership that does what the letter warned against. Citi now provides the banking behind a Coinbase account product paying 3.75% a year, first reported by BeInCrypto.

Citi Turns Stablecoin Payments Into Ordinary Bank Settlements

Under the arrangement, a customer pays a Citi client in stablecoins, Coinbase catches the payment and converts it to dollars, and Citi settles the funds like any other bank transfer. Coinbase described the setup in a post on X as bringing “instant stablecoin acceptance for institutions” onto “bank-grade, regulated infrastructure.”

The merchant never holds a token. The flow also runs in reverse: Coinbase’s payments customers get a Citi account-style product that converts incoming cash into stablecoins, which sit at Coinbase earning the 3.75% reward.

Citi says the Senate’s failure to pass the Clarity Act changes nothing about its plans. Shahmir Khaliq, Citi’s head of services, told the Wall Street Journal the bank is proceeding within its existing charter.

We are not hampered. We’re continuing to do what we do within the banking license we have, within the regulations we currently have.

Shahmir Khaliq, head of services, Citi

Fraser’s Trade Group Asked Congress to Prohibit the Reward Citi Now Banks

The signers wrote that “when deposits decline, it reduces the availability of credit that supports communities and pathways to upward mobility,” and asked the Senate to close what they called loopholes in the bill’s yield ban before it reached a floor vote.

Days later the bill failed the procedural vote 49-50, eleven votes shy of the 60 needed to advance, with the Journal reporting the rewards fight as a contributing factor. Citi’s own product with Coinbase now pays the 3.75% reward the letter sought to prohibit, a gap between lobbying position and business practice that neither Citi nor the Forum has publicly addressed.

Regulators Have Not Settled the Yield Question the Letter Raised

The joint letter’s core request, a blanket ban on interest-like payments regardless of how stablecoin issuers structure them, never made it into law once the Clarity Act stalled. That leaves the reward-versus-yield distinction to be fought out issuer by issuer.

Neither the letter nor the Citi-Coinbase announcement specifies whether the 3.75% is legally a “reward” tied to transaction activity, the category the trade groups said they would tolerate, or an interest-like payment on balances, the category they wanted banned.

BeInCrypto’s report named no merchants yet using the checkout service and no launch date, and Citi separately confirmed it is extending its private blockchain for corporate cash movement to Japan and the United Arab Emirates as part of the same push.

The CCS read. Citi’s move signals that large banks now see stablecoin infrastructure as revenue, not just a deposit threat, regardless of what their own trade associations tell Congress. For institutional treasurers, the practical test will be whether Citi’s 3.75% product survives a future rewards ban intact, or gets restructured once regulators define the line the ABA letter asked Congress to draw.

The Clarity Act’s stablecoin-yield language remains unresolved in the Senate, and neither Citi nor Coinbase has set a public launch date or named a merchant using the checkout service. Whether Congress revisits a narrower rewards ban, or leaves the Fed’s GENIUS Act rulemaking to settle the question instead, will determine if Citi’s 3.75% product needs to change shape before it scales.

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

Fairshake deploys $30 million to oust Sherrod Brown over CLARITY Act stall
Regulation & Policy

Fairshake deploys $30 million to oust Sherrod Brown over CLARITY Act stall

, , , , , ,

Legal & CrimeCrypto Coin Show News Team·September 21, 2026·3 min read

Fairshake, the crypto industry’s largest political action committee, has earmarked $30 million to defeat Sherrod Brown’s bid to reclaim his Ohio Senate seat, tying the spending directly to the CLARITY Act’s failed cloture vote. For institutional investors, the move signals that U.S. market structure legislation now rides on midterm election results rather than a lame-duck Congress, with Fairshake still holding roughly $130 million to enforce that outcome.

  • Fairshake has committed $30 million against Brown, a plan first reported by the New York Times and confirmed by journalist Eleanor Terrett.
  • Crypto interests spent more than $40 million against Brown in Ohio during the 2024 cycle, four times any other Senate race that year, per the Associated Press.
  • Fairshake opened 2026 with about $193 million and still held roughly $130 million as of August, funded almost entirely by Coinbase, Ripple and Andreessen Horowitz.
  • $30M Fairshake’s new earmark against Brown versus its $130M reserve
  • $517M crypto, AI and betting corporate spending this cycle versus $461M in all of 2024
  • 60 votes needed for CLARITY Act cloture, which the bill failed to reach

Fairshake is preparing its most aggressive campaign yet against a sitting or former lawmaker, according to a report from Cryptopolitan. The PAC confirmed the $30 million figure to Terrett, citing a Fairshake spokesperson, and the effort has been described as a “revenge spend.” The trigger is Democrats’ role in stalling the CLARITY Act, the industry’s top legislative priority for digital asset market structure.

Brown’s Return Threatens the Senate Banking Committee Gavel

A Brown win would go beyond an Ohio seat. It could restore his seniority and put him back in line for the gavel of the Senate Banking Committee, a post he held from 2021 to 2025.

During that tenure Brown slowed crypto-related legislation to a pace that frustrated industry lobbyists, a record Fairshake is now campaigning against directly. Politico reported in May that Brown lacks a direct path back to that seniority, since Senate Democratic rules tie standing to a member’s current entry into the party conference.

Restoring it would require the caucus to carve out an exception.

Brown is running against Republican Sen. Jon Husted, who took the seat when JD Vance became vice president. Husted faces his own headwinds, as anti-data center lobbyists ramp up spending tying him to unpopular AI infrastructure sites.

Bernie Moreno’s 2024 Win Set the Template for Ohio Spending

This is a rematch. Crypto interests poured more than $40 million into Ohio during the 2024 cycle, a sum the Associated Press said was four times what the industry spent in any other Senate race that year. Republican Bernie Moreno won with more than $230 million in outside backing against $154 million for Brown, and Brown lost 46% to 50%.

Senate GOP campaign arm chair Sen. Tim Scott of South Carolina credited the industry directly for the result at a blockchain event, per the Associated Press.

Thank you to all of y’all for getting rid of Sherrod Brown. Literally, the industry put Bernie Moreno in the Senate.

Sen. Tim Scott, chair of the National Republican Senatorial Committee

Brown has since softened his rhetoric. Campaign manager Patrick Eisenhauer told Politico that Brown “recognizes that cryptocurrency is a part of America’s economy” and would “keep an open mind.”

The shift has not moved advocacy group Stand With Crypto, which still ranks Brown “strongly against crypto.”

Corporate Political Spending Tops $517M Ahead of November 3

Fairshake’s war chest sits inside a broader surge. Crypto, AI and online betting firms account for at least $517 million in corporate election spending this cycle, according to Public Citizen data cited by Cryptopolitan, already surpassing the $461 million corporations spent across all of the 2024 cycle.

President Donald Trump has said he will deploy his $400 million MAGA Inc. super PAC to protect vulnerable Republicans, adding a third major funding stream to the midterms.

The stakes trace back to September 15, when the CLARITY Act’s cloture vote failed to reach the 60 votes needed to advance, a setback we covered in The CLARITY Act’s Window Is Closing. That failure, following the bill’s earlier progress detailed in our committee-passage coverage, is what converted a policy fight into an election-spending campaign.

The CCS read. Fairshake’s spending pattern tells institutional allocators more than any Washington vote count. A PAC willing to commit a quarter of its reserves to one Senate race, after already outspending every other 2024 contest fourfold in the same state, is betting that Congress, not the SEC or CFTC, will end up writing crypto’s rulebook. That bet is now the clearest signal of where regulatory clarity actually gets decided.

Ohio voters decide the race on November 3, and the outcome will determine whether the CLARITY Act gets revived in the next Congress or whether the SEC and CFTC write digital asset rules through enforcement instead.

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

Bitwise CIO: institutional crypto adoption proceeds without CLARITY Act passage
ETF

Bitwise CIO: institutional crypto adoption proceeds without CLARITY Act passage

, , , , , , ,

BitcoinCrypto Coin Show News Team·September 18, 2026·3 min read

Bitwise’s CIO argues the CLARITY Act’s Senate defeat does not derail crypto’s institutional adoption, citing Bitcoin’s $23,000 rally despite falling legislative odds. Institutional capital flows, from Robinhood’s blockchain launch to Morgan Stanley’s Solana ETF, show Wall Street is moving forward independent of Congress.

  • Bitcoin climbed from $57,950 on July 1 to above $80,000 by September 4, while CLARITY Act passage odds fell from 39% to 18%.
  • US Bitcoin ETFs attracted $159 million in inflows on Thursday, September 18, after two days of outflows, with BlackRock’s IBIT posting gains.
  • Institutional players including Morgan Stanley, Robinhood, and the DTCC have independently deployed crypto infrastructure without waiting for Senate approval.
  • $23,050 Bitcoin’s net gain from July lows to early September highs
  • 39% to 18% Decline in CLARITY Act passage odds during same period
  • $159M US Bitcoin ETF inflows on Thursday versus prior two-day outflow period

The failure of the CLARITY Act in the Senate has shaken confidence in crypto regulation, but Bitwise Chief Investment Officer Matt Hougan argues institutional adoption is accelerating independent of legislative outcomes. While Hougan acknowledged the bill would have provided clearer rules, his analysis of market timing reveals a disconnect: Bitcoin rallied from $57,950 on July 1 to above $80,000 by September 4, a $23,000 advance that occurred as Polymarket odds for CLARITY passage collapsed from 39 percent to 18 percent. The divergence suggests investors were not pricing in legislative approval.

Bitcoin rallied $23,000 while Congress odds halved, signaling institutional momentum independent of legislation

Hougan’s core argument rests on a straightforward observation: the crypto market has moved on. Rather than waiting for Congress to act, Wall Street firms have begun deploying their own infrastructure. Morgan Stanley launched a Solana ETF, Robinhood built its own blockchain, and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation completed its first tokenized stock settlement through blockchain rails.

Each represents a major financial institution sidestepping the legislative process and betting directly on the asset class.

The pattern extends across the regulatory landscape. While Congress stalled on CLARITY, the SEC proposed Regulation Crypto Assets in August, moving unilaterally to establish asset classification rules that could take effect without legislative approval.

SEC moves independently on crypto assets regulation as institutional capital flows accelerate regardless of Senate outcome

The immediate market reaction after the Senate vote did inflict short-term damage, Bitcoin fell following the announcement, adding pressure to the session. Yet Hougan frames the setback as temporary friction rather than structural collapse. He noted that crypto operated without core legislation for 17 years before reaching a $2.5 trillion asset class valuation.

Crypto spent its first 17 years without core market legislation. Without Clarity, it has managed to go from a fringe idea to a $2.5 trillion asset class that’s reshaped everything from global payments to capital markets.

Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer, Bitwise

The distinction matters for institutional investors assessing regulatory risk. Agency rules imposed by the SEC or CFTC remain vulnerable to reversal by future administrations, whereas Congress-backed legislation typically carries greater permanence. Congressional authority over the CFTC’s spot market jurisdiction remains notably absent, a gap that could invite stricter enforcement later.

For now, the absence of CLARITY leaves the regulatory framework fragmented, but fragmentation has not halted capital deployment.

Bitcoin ETF inflows resume after brief outflow period as market stabilizes post-vote

US-based Bitcoin ETFs recovered after two consecutive days of net outflows, capturing $159 million in inflows on Thursday. BlackRock’s IBIT led the reversal, posting net gains, while Grayscale’s HYPE also registered $4.25 million in inflows. The bounce signals a shift from panic selling to renewed accumulation, though the recovery remains modest against the prior outflow cycle.

Ethereum ETFs moved in the opposite direction, posting $39.2 million in net outflows and extending their losing streak to three consecutive days.

The CCS read. We see institutional acceptance of regulatory fragmentation. The Senate’s failure to pass CLARITY removes an option for long-term certainty, but it does not erase the fact that BlackRock, Morgan Stanley, and the DTCC have each chosen to move forward now rather than wait. That calculus, institutional capital already deployed beats hypothetical future clarity, shifts the burden of proof to those arguing crypto needs Congress to thrive.

The test will arrive when a future administration reverses SEC or CFTC rulemaking on crypto assets. Until then, watch whether the inflows into Bitcoin ETFs sustain above the $150 million threshold over the coming week, and whether institutional players like those who attended the White House crypto summit announce additional infrastructure deployments in the absence of legislative cover.

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

Coinbase CEO Armstrong shifts focus to SEC and CFTC after Senate blocks CLARITY Act
Exchange News

Coinbase CEO Armstrong shifts focus to SEC and CFTC after Senate blocks CLARITY Act

, , , , , , ,

Regulation & PolicyCrypto Coin Show News Team·September 16, 2026·4 min read

Coinbase co-founder Brian Armstrong said the crypto industry must stop waiting for congressional action after the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act failed a Senate procedural vote, signaling a shift toward regulatory agency rulemaking. The setback forces institutional players to prepare for regulatory clarity defined by the SEC and CFTC rather than by law.

  • Senate procedural vote on CLARITY Act fell short of 60 votes needed to advance the bill on Tuesday
  • Brian Armstrong said the SEC and CFTC already possess sufficient authority to establish clear crypto rules
  • Three Republican senators and procedural concerns from allies blocked consensus, with Democrats citing unresolved ethics issues
  • 60 votes required for Senate advancement; procedural vote fell short of this threshold
  • ~12 Democrats considered possible supporters before negotiations over ethics rules collapsed
  • 4 Republicans and independents opposed or blocked the measure for strategic reasons

The US Senate failed to advance the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act after a procedural vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to move forward, according to reporting by CryptoPotato. The defeat came after last-minute negotiations between Republicans and crypto-friendly Democrats collapsed over ethics rules and concerns about President Trump and his family’s involvement in the crypto industry. The outcome leaves institutional crypto firms and investors without the legislative framework they have pursued for months, forcing a recalibration toward regulatory rather than legislative paths to certainty.

Armstrong Pivots to SEC and CFTC Authority After Congressional Defeat

Coinbase co-founder Brian Armstrong said the industry must abandon its reliance on Congress and instead expect the SEC and CFTC to establish clear rules using their existing authority. Armstrong said that “clarity” will come to crypto regardless of the bill’s fate, framing the legislative failure as a potential advantage because some concessions baked into CLARITY were difficult to accept. His statement reflects a strategic recalibration: if regulators move unilaterally, the industry may avoid compromises it opposed.

Ripple CEO Brad Garlinghouse offered a different tone, calling the loss one that “stings” and describing the missed opportunity as larger than any single company.

Garlinghouse blamed Democratic opposition and what he termed the “anti-crypto army” for the defeat, yet expressed confidence that SEC Chair Atkins and CFTC Chair Selig will continue developing rules to address gaps left by the failed bill.

Both executives signaled that institutional clarity will emerge through regulatory action rather than legislation, though on a timeline and under terms neither company controls.

Three Republican Senators and Procedural Tactics Blocked Consensus

Three Republicans, Susan Collins of Maine, Josh Hawley of Missouri, and Jerry Moran of Kansas, voted against the measure, while North Carolina Senator Thom Tillis voted no on procedural grounds to preserve a motion to reconsider and keep the door open for a future vote.

Democratic support collapsed after negotiations over ethics rules failed to produce an agreement. Around a dozen Democrats had been seen as potential supporters, but concerns about Trump family involvement in crypto and unresolved ethics safeguards led them to withhold their votes. Delaware Democrat Chris Coons did not vote.

Senators Ruben Gallego and Catherine Cortez Masto both suggested that Republican leadership ended talks before a compromise on ethics protections could be reached, framing the failure as a breakdown in bipartisan negotiation rather than outright opposition to crypto regulation itself.

Regulatory Action Likely to Fill the Legislative Void

Both Armstrong and Garlinghouse said they expect the SEC and CFTC to move forward with rulemaking using their existing statutory authority, a shift that removes the need for congressional votes but also removes industry leverage over the final rules.

The failure of CLARITY leaves institutional investors and platforms in legal gray zones that regulators will now fill through enforcement guidance, no-action letters, and formal rulemaking.

Unlike a statutory framework, which would have applied uniformly across agencies, regulatory action may produce divergent rules from the SEC and CFTC or inconsistencies between their approaches and those of state regulators.

Institutions preparing for this environment must now monitor multiple agencies rather than tracking a single congressional process, and face the risk that rules issued unilaterally will be stricter than a negotiated legislative compromise would have been.

The CCS read. We read Armstrong’s pivot as pragmatic rather than optimistic. The industry avoided a bad deal but surrendered leverage over the outcome. Regulatory rules, once issued, cannot be negotiated like bills can; they can only be challenged in court or through the political system after they take effect. Institutional players should prepare for agency action on a faster timeline than Congress was moving, but with less room to influence the final shape of compliance obligations.

Watch for the SEC and CFTC to issue guidance or begin formal rulemaking within the next 90 days, and for any signals from Chair Atkins or Chair Selig on whether they plan to coordinate or issue separate rules addressing digital asset classification, custody, and market conduct standards.

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

Federal Reserve raises rates 25 basis points as Bitcoin jumps to $76,500
Equities

Federal Reserve raises rates 25 basis points for first time in three years

, , , , ,

BitcoinCrypto Coin Show News Team·September 16, 2026·2 min read

The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate by 25 basis points to 3.75-4% in a unanimous decision, marking the first hike in three years and signaling sustained inflation concerns that typically weigh on risk assets, yet Bitcoin surged $1,500 to $76,500, suggesting institutional investors had already priced in the move.

  • Fed raised the federal funds rate target range to 3.75-4%, the first increase in three years via unanimous 12-0 vote
  • Bitcoin climbed $1,500 to $76,500 following the announcement, reversing recent losses from the CLARITY Act’s Senate rejection
  • Fed Chair Kevin Warsh’s next speech is now the focal point for determining whether rate hikes will continue or pause
  • 25 bps Size of the Fed’s rate increase, the first in three years
  • $1,500 Bitcoin’s immediate rally following the rate hike announcement
  • 12-0 Unanimous Federal Open Market Committee vote authorizing the increase

The Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 25 basis points Wednesday (September 16), lifting the federal funds target range to 3.75-4% in a unanimous 12-0 vote by the Federal Open Market Committee. The move marked the central bank’s first rate increase in three years and reflected persistent inflation pressures highlighted by last week’s consumer price index data and a stronger-than-expected labor report from earlier in September.

Bitcoin surges as market absorbs widely anticipated rate hike

Bitcoin’s response defied the typical inverse relationship between digital assets and rising rates. The token climbed $1,500 to trade at $76,500 in the hours after the announcement, reversing sharp losses from Tuesday (September 15) when the Senate rejected the CLARITY Act, a bipartisan crypto regulation bill.

The rebound signaled that institutional investors had already positioned for the Fed decision and viewed the rate increase as priced into markets.

The timing of the hike followed hawkish signals from Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, whose recent speech had telegraphed the decision to markets in advance.

Warsh’s next remarks will determine whether rate-hiking cycle continues

The focal point for crypto and broader markets now rests on Warsh’s next public appearance. His communications have become a proxy for Fed intent on whether the central bank will pause after this move or press ahead with additional tightening.

For Bitcoin holders and institutional traders, clarity on the Fed’s forward guidance carries outsized weight, as rate expectations drive capital allocation across risk assets including digital currencies.

The rejection of the CLARITY Act, which would have created a coherent regulatory framework for crypto markets, added uncertainty on the policy front independent of monetary tightening.

The CCS read. The Fed’s first rate hike in three years trades as a stabilizing event rather than a shock, suggesting institutions have already repositioned away from rate-sensitive positions in crypto and are now watching for guidance on how long tightening will last. The CLARITY Act’s failure is the more material stumbling block for crypto adoption at institutional scale.

Watch for Fed Chair Warsh’s next public speech to signal whether the Fed plans to continue raising rates or signal a pause; the timing and tone of his remarks will likely drive the next major move in Bitcoin and crypto-linked institutional flows.

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

Seven Senate Democrats withdraw CLARITY Act support over Trump ethics provisions
Regulation & Policy

Senate Democrats block CLARITY Act over Trump ethics provisions

, , , , , ,

Legal & CrimeCrypto Coin Show News Team·September 15, 2026·4 min read

The Senate’s rejection of the CLARITY Act marks a decisive setback for institutional crypto infrastructure in the US, with bipartisan sponsors unable to hold a Democratic coalition over ethics safeguards tied to Trump’s financial interests. Institutional investors and trading firms now face ongoing regulatory uncertainty and delayed market-structure reforms that had been positioned as near-final.

  • The CLARITY Act failed to secure 60 votes needed for cloture, blocking Senate floor consideration of H.R. 3633.
  • Seven Democratic co-sponsors, Gillibrand, Warner, Booker, Warnock, Gallego, Alsobrooks, and Cortez Masto, voted against proceeding with the bill.
  • Last-minute ethics negotiations broke down over restrictions on crypto holdings by Trump and senior officials, leaving Republicans without their Democratic coalition.
  • 60 votes required for cloture; the CLARITY Act fell short of this threshold
  • 126 substantive changes incorporated into the 635-page final text over the weekend
  • $1.4 billion collected by Trump and his family from crypto-related ventures, per Sanders

The Senate blocked the CLARITY Act on a cloture vote that split both parties, ending months of negotiations meant to deliver the most comprehensive US crypto market-structure legislation since the SEC-CFTC framework emerged. According to reporting first published by CryptoSlate, Republican sponsors had released a sweeping 635-page rewrite over the weekend incorporating 126 changes Democrats had requested, while President Donald Trump agreed to tougher ethics restrictions on crypto holdings by him and senior officials. The measure still collapsed. The breakdown exposes a fracture within the bipartisan group that had shaped the legislation for months: seven Democrats who helped draft it voted to block its advance, withholding the 60 votes the Senate requires to proceed to floor debate.

Seven Democratic co-sponsors vote against their own bill over ethics safeguards

Sens. Kirsten Gillibrand, Mark Warner, Cory Booker, Raphael Warnock, Ruben Gallego, Angela Alsobrooks and Catherine Cortez Masto all voted no, signaling that concessions Republicans made on restrictions governing crypto interests held by Trump and administration officials remained insufficient. The defections came after staff negotiations in the Capitol hideaway office of Sen.

Thom Tillis failed to close remaining gaps on ethics rules. Senate Banking Committee Chairman Tim Scott’s staff ended talks without agreement, leaving Republicans to approach the vote without the Democratic coalition they had spent months assembling.

Ethics emerged as the decisive fault line in the final hours.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin, who had been closely involved in drafting the bill, said she opposed it because restrictions on crypto holdings by Trump, his family and administration officials remained too weak, adding that “The ethics provisions in this bill are simply too thin.” Slotkin argued that Congress needed rules robust enough to bind any future administration, regardless of party. She also raised national-security concerns, questioning whether the Commodity Futures Trading Commission and other enforcement agencies possessed adequate staffing to detect money-laundering channels linked to terrorist groups, North Korea and Iran.

Sanders ties crypto industry spending and Trump’s financial stake to the legislative collapse

Sen. Bernie Sanders framed his opposition more broadly, linking opposition to the bill to crypto billionaires’ political spending and Trump’s financial interests in the sector. Sanders noted that crypto industry figures had spent nearly $300 million on the midterm elections, while Trump and his family had collected more than $1.4 billion from crypto-related ventures.

He accused the industry of using that capital to seek favorable legislative treatment and urged senators to reject the bill.

Sanders’ argument implicitly questioned whether any ethics framework tied to Trump could credibly govern conflicts of interest at the highest levels of government.

Republicans face a choice between reopening ethics or abandoning the CLARITY Act

The failed vote leaves Republican sponsors with a narrow path forward, should they choose to pursue one. Reviving the CLARITY Act would require reopening provisions they had already designated as final compromise, most critically the ethics rules that failed to retain support from Democratic co-authors most closely involved in the bill’s construction.

Slotkin indicated she remained open to future negotiations and acknowledged that the bill’s market-structure provisions offered a bipartisan foundation for another attempt, but only if ethics safeguards were strengthened materially.

The timing of the collapse carries institutional weight: market participants have watched the CLARITY Act’s window narrow as the legislative calendar tightens and political priorities shift. The defeat removes what had been positioned as the most plausible near-term path to comprehensive market-structure reform, leaving trading venues, derivatives platforms and asset managers operating under fragmented SEC and CFTC jurisdiction with no clarity on whether a unified framework will emerge before the next Congress.

The CCS read. We view the collapse not as final death of the bill but as evidence that any legislation governing crypto must credibly separate financial incentives from regulatory authority, a hurdle Trump’s involvement has raised, not lowered. Institutional investors should prepare for an extended period of regulatory ambiguity rather than assume ethics concerns, once resolved, deliver a vote. The real question for sponsors is whether reopening negotiations strengthens or weakens their coalition further.

Republican leadership must decide within weeks whether to attempt fresh negotiations on ethics safeguards or let the CLARITY Act expire with the current session; any revival would require at least some Democratic signers to reverse course, a prospect neither side has publicly committed to pursuing.

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

Senate blocks CLARITY Act advancement as bitcoin crashes below $75,000
Bitcoin

Senate rejects CLARITY Act as Bitcoin drops below $75,000

, , , , , , ,

BitcoinCrypto Coin Show News Team·September 15, 2026·3 min read

The Senate’s rejection of the Digital Asset Markets CLARITY Act sent Bitcoin below $75,000 and triggered $760 million in liquidations within hours, signaling institutional reluctance to advance crypto regulation and raising questions about whether the bill will survive further legislative effort.

  • Bitcoin fell to $75,000, down 2.3% in 24 hours, immediately after Senate vote against CLARITY Act advancement
  • Liquidations surged over 200% in one day to $760 million, with $290 million liquidated in a single hour
  • Senate rejection does not kill the bill but suspends it pending debate; sponsors often withdraw after such setbacks
  • $75,000 Bitcoin price after Senate votes against CLARITY Act advancement
  • $760M Total liquidations in 24 hours, versus $290M in the prior hour alone
  • 3.5% Ethereum decline, steeper than Bitcoin’s move in same period

Bitcoin dropped below $75,000 on Tuesday (September 15) after the U.S. Senate failed to advance the Digital Asset Markets CLARITY Act, according to reporting from CryptoPotato. The 2.3% decline in 24 hours coincided with a cascade of liquidations that soared over 200%, reaching $760 million total and $290 million within a single hour as volatility spiked. Ethereum fell 3.5%, Solana 2.2%, and most altcoins moved lower in tandem.

Senate rejects CLARITY Act without killing the legislation outright

The Senate’s vote against advancing the bill does not terminate it but rather delays it pending further debate. The rejection removes immediate momentum and leaves the measure vulnerable to sponsors withdrawing support, a pattern observed after similar parliamentary setbacks in past congresses. The legislation’s window remains open but narrowing, and whether backers will continue pushing it forward remains uncertain.

Institutional crypto investors face a new layer of regulatory uncertainty as the Senate signals divided opinion on digital asset markets oversight.

The CLARITY Act has been positioned as a bipartisan effort to establish clearer guardrails for spot crypto trading and custody, but the failed advance vote suggests insufficient support among senators to move it to the floor without substantial revision.

Broader market liquidations compound Senate-driven volatility

The $760 million in liquidations across the crypto market within 24 hours reflects both leveraged position unwinding and price momentum feeding on itself. The concentration of $290 million liquidated in a single hour points to cascading stop-losses triggered by the combination of regulatory setback and algorithmic trading.

Ethereum’s steeper 3.5% decline versus Bitcoin’s 2.3% suggests higher leverage on altcoins and a flight toward larger-cap assets during the sell-off. Traders holding leveraged longs across multiple assets faced margin calls as collateral values fell simultaneously.

Federal Reserve rate decision adds to Wednesday uncertainty

The Federal Reserve is scheduled to announce its interest rate decision on Wednesday (September 16), which will likely drive additional volatility independent of the Senate vote.

The timing of the CLARITY Act rejection hours before the Fed’s decision creates a dual-catalyst environment for crypto markets. Institutional portfolio managers must now hedge for both regulatory disappointment and potential monetary policy shifts, a combination that often triggers risk-off positioning across risk assets.

The CCS read. We read this as a signal that Senate crypto advocates lack the votes to move CLARITY without Democratic support, and Democrats may be withholding backing until the measure receives stronger institutional safeguards. The bill’s delay is not fatal, but sponsors face pressure to revise it before appetite fully evaporates, a window that closes sharply if the Fed signals prolonged rate pressure Wednesday.

Watch whether bill sponsors move to amend CLARITY and reintroduce it before the end of the legislative session, or whether withdrawal follows within the next two weeks as has occurred with previous failed crypto bills. The Fed’s Wednesday rate decision will also reset market conditions for any renewed legislative push.

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

CLARITY Act’s ‘final’ deal is already breaking down before tomorrow’s Senate vote
Legal & Crime

Multiple Senate factions reject revised CLARITY Act hours before cloture vote

, , , , , , ,

Regulation & PolicySeptember 14, 2026·5 min read

The Senate’s revised CLARITY Act faces an unexpected collapse hours before its scheduled cloture vote, with banks, Democrats, state attorneys general, and developer advocates rejecting key compromises that Republicans touted as final. The breakdown threatens passage of the landmark crypto market-structure bill and exposes deep fractures in a coalition that appeared near consensus weeks ago.

  • Treasury circuit breaker allows stablecoin-driven deposit flight to occur before intervention, not prevent it, banking groups say.
  • New York Attorney General Letitia James leads 18 state attorneys general opposing the bill over weakened state enforcement authority.
  • Senate cloture vote scheduled for 2:15 p.m. Eastern Tuesday requires 60 votes; failure blocks Senate floor consideration entirely.
  • 126 substantive changes Democrats requested incorporated into final bill text
  • 330+ crypto anti-fraud enforcement actions states filed since 2017, now at risk
  • 18 state attorneys general joining New York in formal opposition to CLARITY

Senate Republicans released what they called a final version of the CLARITY Act on Friday, claiming to have resolved disputes that had stalled the bill for months. The revision included 126 substantive Democratic demands and new provisions addressing ethics, stablecoin rewards, developers, and prediction markets. Yet within hours, the compromises unraveled, as first reported by CryptoSlate, a coalition of banking groups, Democratic senators, state attorneys general, and blockchain developers rejected the text as insufficient. The cloture vote scheduled for Tuesday will determine whether the Senate can begin debating the bill; passage requires 60 votes.

State attorneys general warn Treasury safeguard arrives too late for community banks

Republicans added a Treasury “circuit breaker” to address warnings that stablecoin rewards could trigger deposit flight from community banks. Under the provision, the Treasury secretary gains authority to intervene if stablecoins cause substantial deposit flight, but only after damage has begun. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent endorsed the mechanism, saying he would act if stablecoins harm the sector.

Banking groups rejected the reactive approach. Eight trade organizations, including the American Bankers Association and Independent Community Bankers of America, called for an outright prohibition on stablecoin rewards and incentives functioning as deposit interest.

Christopher Williston VI, president of the Independent Bankers Association of Texas, dismissed the Treasury tool as a “meaningless nothing” and “a joke,” arguing regulators should prevent the problem rather than respond to it after losses mount.

The financial sector has lobbied Congress for months to tighten the prohibition, warning that rewards offered through crypto exchanges could make stablecoins functional substitutes for bank deposits and drain funds available for local lending.

New York leads 18 states against bill over preempted enforcement powers

New York Attorney General Letitia James assembled a bipartisan coalition of 18 other state attorneys general to oppose CLARITY, citing its impact on state enforcement authority. James said the bill would weaken state registration and anti-fraud powers while expanding SEC authority to preempt state rules. Her office documented more than 330 crypto-related anti-fraud enforcement actions states have filed since 2017.

The concern reflects a structural tension in the bill: giving federal regulators clearer jurisdiction over crypto markets while narrowing state-level tools.

James warned the legislation would “embolden scammers and potentially strip attorneys general of our authority to protect our states’ investors and their wallets.” This opposition cuts across party lines, undermining Republican claims that the final version had settled the federalism question.

Democratic senators call ethics restrictions on Trump inadequate and unenforceable

The revised text requires covered federal officials with substantial crypto holdings to divest or place assets in qualified blind trusts, with state attorneys general given a role in enforcement. But Democratic staff are circulating arguments that the mechanism lacks teeth. According to Punchbowl News, staff for Senator Elizabeth Warren contend that the Justice Department retains key enforcement authority and that state enforcement can be blocked if White House ethics officials clear the conduct.

The selling point of the compromise was enforcement power independent of an administration that could otherwise overlook its own officials’ conflicts.

Senator Richard Blumenthal rejected the revised language, accusing Trump of using crypto to profit from the presidency and calling the legislation’s restrictions “half measures.” Senator Chris Van Hollen said the bill still contains loopholes involving Trump’s crypto interests and does too little to combat illicit finance and protect consumers. Van Hollen noted he had previously offered amendments to address those concerns, but Republicans blocked them.

Developers lose criminal-law safeguards despite regulatory protections restored

Republicans preserved regulatory protections shielding developers from classification as money transmitters or financial institutions merely for writing software, and extended those protections to miners and validators. However, they removed explicit protections tied to 18 U.S.C. Section 1960, the criminal statute governing unlicensed money transmitting.

Jason Somensatto, director of policy at the Coin Center, called the limitation disappointing, noting that regulatory codification still helps but the absence of criminal-law protections makes Michael Lewellen’s legal challenge against the Justice Department more consequential for the sector’s long-term safety.

Tribal gaming groups reject prediction-market narrowing as insufficient protection

Republicans narrowed decentralized-finance protections so they do not alter derivatives rules or create exemptions affecting prediction markets, hoping to settle concerns from tribal nations and state gaming regulators.

Indian Gaming Association Chairman David Z. Bean said the changes still “do not address the concerns of Indian Country.” The association seeks explicit protections for tribal and state gaming laws and the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, plus restrictions preventing federally regulated prediction-market platforms from offering sports betting and casino-style contracts.

Bean has argued the legislation would otherwise expand Commodity Futures Trading Commission authority at the expense of tribal sovereignty.

Senator Cynthia Lummis, a leading voice for passage, disputed Bean’s characterization, saying she met with him and the association on June 25 and that the group had been consulted on the fix without expressing opposition at that time. The conflicting accounts suggest the tribal dispute remains unresolved despite the attempted compromise.

Tech sector support stands firm as vote becomes test of Republican coalition-building

Support for the legislation remains strong within parts of the technology and crypto industries. Y Combinator backed the CLARITY Act as “bullish,” arguing that clearer regulatory responsibilities would enable US fintech founders to build blockchain-based products. That backing demonstrates the bill retains backing from core constituencies even as opposition widens across banking, Democratic politics, state enforcement, and tribal sovereignty advocates. The previous effort to advance CLARITY faced similar headwinds, suggesting structural opposition that compromises have not resolved.

Tuesday’s 2:15 p.m. Eastern cloture vote will test whether the concessions Republicans assembled can secure 60 votes to begin Senate floor debate. Failure to reach that threshold would block consideration entirely, leaving Republicans with a heavily revised bill and little evidence the revisions produced a working coalition, forcing a decision on whether to attempt further negotiation or abandon the legislation in this session.

Get this in your inboxThe Crypto Coin Show newsletter covers the policy and market moves institutional crypto investors are pricing in.

Subscribe

Load More