Just a couple of days after a cryptic tweet on X containing XRP’s logo, the official channel behind the Solana ecosystem announced that a 1:1-backed token redeemable for Ripple’s cross-border token has launched on its blockchain.
The statement coincided with notable price gains charted by XRP and SOL today as the geopolitical tension in the Middle East eased.
XRP is a digital asset native to the XRP Ledger, a decentralized public blockchain designed for fast, low-cost transactions.
The product, dubbed wXRP, will be available on the Solana blockchain through a partnership with Hex Trust, which will provide custodial services, and LayerZero’s cross-chain bridge.
The new wrapped asset is verifiable on tokens.xyz and immediately available for use in several Solana DeFi applications, including Phantom wallet, Jupiter Exchange, Titan Exchange, byreal_io, and Meteora.
The move now follows a pledge from Hex Trust from late 2025 to expand XRP’s DeFi capabilities across different chains, starting with Solana.
The ever-vocal XRP Army was quick to pick up and praise the announcement, with John Squire saying, “The flip just switched.” The timing is also quite intriguing as it comes on a day when the crypto market jumped after the de-escalation developments in the war between the US/Israel and Iran.
XRP was at the forefront of gains today, surging to just over $1.50 for the first time in almost a month. SOL briefly surpassed $90 before it slipped to just under that level now.
Crypto rhetoric has long prized the ability to transact without gatekeepers, to move value across borders without asking permission, and to hold assets no institution could seize.
Crypto culture treated these as design virtues, properties that builders embedded with ethical weight by deliberate architectural choice. Then the Drift exploit happened, and the backlash told a different story.
On Apr. 1, Drift suffered a major exploit. Circle later described the publicly reported losses as exceeding $270 million, while other reports put the figure around $285 million and documented criticism that Circle had not frozen stolen USDC as it moved across its cross-chain rails.
The attacker routed roughly $232 million in USDC from Solana to Ethereum using Circle’s Cross-Chain Transfer Protocol. The backlash stemmed from users and observers wanting to know why Circle had not intervened sooner.
Days later, Tether CEO Paolo Ardoino posted that Tether had frozen 3.29 million USDT tied to the Rhea Finance attacker, framing the intervention as proof that “Tether cares.”
Circle published its formal response on Apr. 10, and its core argument was that USDC freezes occur when the law requires action. Circle is legally compelled by an appropriate authority through a lawful process.
Circle pushed back on the idea that an issuer should act as an ad hoc chain police force, arguing that open access to permissionless infrastructure is a feature, and that the bigger problem is that legal frameworks have not yet kept pace with the speed of on-chain exploits.
The stablecoin issuer also made a property-rights argument, claiming that arbitrary freezes set dangerous precedents for lawful users, and the power to freeze is a compliance obligation, constrained by lawful process and legal compulsion, authorized only through formal legal channels.
The complication is that Circle’s own legal documents tell a more layered story.
USDC terms state that transfers are irreversible and that Circle carries no obligation to track or determine the provenance of balances.
Those same terms also reserve Circle’s right to block certain addresses and, for Circle-custodied balances, freeze associated USDC in its sole discretion when it believes those addresses may be tied to illegal activity or terms violations.
Circle holds meaningful freeze power and frames it as a tightly bound compliance function, constrained by legal process and compulsion.
Ardoino’s Rhea post was a boast, and Tether’s terms grant it broad discretion by stating that the company may freeze tokens as required by law or whenever it determines, in its sole discretion, that doing so is prudent, and authorizing it to blacklist token addresses.
In February, Tether froze approximately $4.2 billion in USDT due to links to illicit activity, with $3.5 billion of that since 2023.
Circle freezes USDC only when legally compelled, while Tether reserves sole discretion to freeze and has frozen $4.2 billion over illicit-activity links.
The feature nobody advertised
What Drift and Rhea forced into the open is a question that stablecoin competition had not yet fully surfaced: in a hack, what do users actually want from an issuer?
The anti-censorship instincts that shaped crypto’s early culture tend to lose their force the moment users need an emergency brake. Affected protocols, exchanges holding stolen funds, and victims watching their balances drain want to know who can stop the thief.
That reframes freeze capacity as more of a consumer-protection feature.
Tether has been accumulating a record of intervention and visibility. Ardoino’s Rhea post was designed to be read as a product statement, and in the context of a fresh exploit, it worked.
The emotional and practical logic is accessible, showing that one issuer froze stolen funds the same day an attacker moved them, while another issuer said legal timelines tied its hands.
This makes optics difficult for Circle regardless of the legal merits of its position.
Stablecoins are quietly differentiating themselves in emergency governance, alongside reserve composition and exchange liquidity.
The cost of the feature
The case for Circle’s position is real and does not require dismissing the Drift backlash to hold. Broad issuer discretion over freezes creates risks that extend far beyond hack scenarios.
An issuer that can freeze tokens in its sole discretion when it determines it is prudent can freeze tokens for reasons unrelated to protecting victims. Politically contentious addresses, disputed transactions, regulatory scrutiny from a single jurisdiction, or simple operational error can all trigger freezes under terms as broad as Tether’s.
The same capacity that lets an issuer stop a thief also lets it stop a protester, a dissident from a sanctioned country, or a business whose activity it finds inconvenient.
Circle’s public writing on the Drift exploit is, among other things, a defense against that risk. The argument that emergency intervention needs new legal frameworks and safe-harbor structures is also an argument that the current situation is a problem, even when the targets are criminals.
The absence of defined standards means an issuer can act generously today and overreach tomorrow, with no formal mechanism to distinguish the two.
Tether’s freeze record has not yet produced a major documented wrongful-freeze controversy, but that record is also vast and not fully transparent.
Reports on the $4.2 billion in frozen USDT withhold the details of each decision, the legal process underlying each freeze, and the error rate across thousands of enforcement actions.
Fast intervention looks different in the abstract when the process generating those interventions is opaque.
Benefit of fast freezes
Cost of broad freeze discretion
Can slow or stop stolen funds
Can enable arbitrary intervention
May improve recovery odds
Can affect lawful users
Helps exchanges/protocols in crises
Can reflect political or regulatory pressure
Looks like consumer protection in hacks
Process may be opaque
Becomes a due-diligence feature
Wrongful-freeze risk may be hard to challenge
Two paths from here
The bull case for intervention-first issuers runs in a world where hacks keep coming, and recoverability keeps rising on the priority list.
More regulatory scrutiny on exchanges to show they take asset protection seriously, and more institutional users who need to demonstrate due diligence in custody and recovery. These are factors that push emergency freeze capacity to the center of stablecoin evaluation.
In that scenario, Tether’s public freeze record and broad discretionary terms become genuine competitive assets. Exchanges and protocols that have experienced exploits now treat fast-intervention capacity as a due diligence criterion when choosing which stablecoin to hold as primary liquidity.
Circle has to either act faster through new legal mechanisms or accept that some market segments will treat its rule-of-law posture as a liability in crises. Ardoino’s Rhea post, in retrospect, looks like an early entry in a competition that the market eventually formalizes.
The bear case for that same model runs through wrongful freezes, regulatory backlash, and the discovery that broad discretion is often a liability as much as a virtue.
A high-profile incorrect freeze, such as an address flagged as malicious that belongs to a legitimate user, a jurisdiction-specific enforcement action that appears to be politically targeted at users in other markets, or an operational error that freezes clean funds during a market stress event, turns the same emergency-governance story toxic.
In that world, Circle’s insistence on lawful process and defined standards looks like principled restraint, a deliberate commitment to defined limits over speed, and users place a real premium on an issuer whose freeze decisions carry formal accountability.
The crypto community’s historical skepticism toward centralized control reasserts itself as hard-won practical wisdom, grounded in the documented costs of unchecked issuer discretion.
The stablecoin winners in that scenario are the ones whose intervention power is real but bounded. Issuers who can act in genuine emergencies and demonstrate they held back in ambiguous ones.
Stablecoin governance splits between intervention-first issuers gaining crisis goodwill and bounded-discretion issuers winning users who reprice centralization risk, per Circle and Tether materials.
As stablecoins deepen their role in institutional payments, treasury workflows, and regulated financial infrastructure, governance under stress becomes as material as reserve quality or distribution reach.
The question that Drift and Rhea put on the table of how much control users want an issuer to have has no clean universal answer. Institutions with large exposures and recovery obligations may want emergency brakes, while individuals holding stablecoins across politically sensitive jurisdictions may want the opposite.
Protocols with mixed user bases need to answer for both.
The real contest now is for the version of stablecoin governance that earns enough trust from enough users to become the default.
The Trump administration is being aggressively questioned by Democratic senators on seemingly lax oversight of Binance regarding some funds that ended up in the wrong hands in Iran, pouring cold water on President Trump’s parade as Iran relented on its Strait of Hormuz blockade in a peace deal that looked elusive until it was announced.
Adding to the controversy is the lenient settlement with a Turkish bank accused of laundering billions for Iran, which not only lets the bank off but also deprives American victims of Iranian-linked terrorism of necessary funds.
Senators question lax oversight of Binance
On Friday, Senator Richard Blumenthal (D-Conn.) sent urgent letters to the Department of Justice (DOJ) and the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) demanding answers regarding the status of two independent monitors assigned to Binance.
A day before sending these letters, Blumenthal joined Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer and Senator Adam Schiff in investigating the DOJ’s decision to drop criminal charges against Turkiye Halk Bankasi (Halkbank) without imposing a single dollar in fines.
The federal oversight of Binance in question was part of a 2023 settlement where the company paid a $4.3 billion fine for failing to maintain proper anti-money laundering (AML) controls. Alongside that, the government installed two monitors to watch the exchange’s every move. Frances McLeod reports to the DOJ, while Sharon Cohen Levin reports to FinCEN.
However, in the Senator’s letters sent Friday and seen by Fortune, he mentions “mounting allegations of dangerously lax anti-money laundering prevention” and recent reports that over $1.7 billion in crypto flowed through Binance to Iran-linked wallets.
Reports have also surfaced that the DOJ paused corporate monitorships for companies like Glencore and Boeing back in 2025.
Blumenthal stated that Binance allegedly took two months to respond to law enforcement about terrorist financing and five months to remove a suspicious vendor named “Blessed Trust.”
In a separate letter sent April 1 to Binance’s Co-CEO Richard Teng, he said, “Binance’s failure to provide the Subcommittee with the full material requested in its inquiry, in addition to details in its response in relation to subsequent reporting, raises further alarms about its candor.”
The Senator is also demanding internal data on whether Binance has weakened its compliance policies since 2025, specifically regarding the labeling of accounts tied to Iran. In some cases, internal warnings reportedly labeled risky accounts with “Don’t block. Internal accounts.”
What happened to the fine imposed on Halkbank?
The DOJ recently agreed to a deferred prosecution agreement with Halkbank, a Turkish state-owned bank accused of helping Iran evade sanctions.
People dissatisfied with the details of the settlement claim it is incredibly lax despite allegations that Halkbank helped Iran access a $20 billion slush fund. The bank will pay $0 in fines, admit no wrongdoing, and provide no compensation to US victims of Iranian terrorism.
Blumenthal and his colleagues, Schiff and Schumer, are demanding answers. “The timing of this agreement, coinciding with President Trump’s initiation of a war against Iran that he justified in part by citing Iran’s history of terrorist attacks against U.S. citizens, makes the Department’s decision even more incomprehensible,” the Senators wrote in their letter to Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche.
The Senators are specifically asking if President Trump pressured the DOJ to protect the bank.
They pointed out reports that following a September 2025 White House visit by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan, Erdogan reportedly assured his circle that “the Halkbank problem is over for us.”
Senator Ron Wyden also wrote to Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, stating that abandoning the prosecution while fighting a war with Iran is “nothing short of rank incompetence.”
DOGE price may reach $0.162142 by the end of 2026.
By 2028, DOGE may potentially achieve a peak price of $0.3423.
By 2032, DOGE might touch $0.702617 with an average trading price of $0.675593.
Propelled by a dedicated community of part-time developers and enthusiastic internet supporters, Dogecoin is poised for significant growth in the coming years. Despite relying on borrowed code due to limited resources, its popularity continues to soar, with tens of thousands of social media followers advocating for supply limitations. However, the Dogecoin ecosystem is expected to develop and expand over time. Having touched its ATH at $0.7376, will DOGE reach $1?
Let’s get into the Dogecoin price prediction and technical analysis.
Overview
Cryptocurrency
Dogecoin
Token
DOGE
Price
$0.102 (+5.44%)
Market Cap
$17.28B
Trading Volume (24-hour)
$2.98B
Circulating Supply
169.58B DOGE
All-time High
$0.7316 May 08, 2021
All-time Low
$0.00008547 May 07, 2015
24-hour High
$0.102
24-hour Low
$0.09674
Dogecoin price prediction: Technical analysis
Current Price
$0.102
Price Prediction
$0.1130 (14.35%)
Fear & Greed Index
21 (Extreme Fear)
Sentiment
Neutral
Volatility
1.96%
Green Days
17/30 (57%)
50-Day SMA
$0.09341
Dogecoin price analysis
TL;DR Breakdown:
Dogecoin price analysis shows a bullish trend with the price jumping to $0.102.
The coin reports 5.44% gains in its value for the past 24 hours.
The DOGE coin faces immediate resistance around the $0.106 level.
As of April 17, 2026, Dogecoin’s price analysis reveals a bullish trend. The memecoin’s value significantly increased to $0.102 today, as it shows 5.44% gains over the last 24 hours. The current situation suggests the presence of buying pressure around the recent highs, as the memecoin found support and is racing today.
Dogecoin 1-day price chart analysis
The one-day chart for Dogecoin indicates a solid bullish trend with buying momentum continuing near local highs for the altcoin. The memecoin’s price increased to $0.102 today, as green candlesticks on the 1-day chart shows the return of a larger bullish trend. The immediate support for Dogecoin is also present at the $0.094 level.
The distance between the Bollinger Bands defines the intensity of volatility. This distance is widening, leading to comparatively high volatility levels. Moreover, the upper limit of the Bollinger Bands indicator, indicating the breached resistance level, has shifted to $0.0988, whereas its lower limit, indicating support, has moved to $0.0874.
The Relative Strength Index (RSI) indicator is trending in the neutral area. The indicator’s curve has reached 64 in the past 24 hours. The indicator gives a buy indication as it moves upward, hinting at the presence of bullish elements.
DOGE/USD 4-hour price analysis
Buyers’ support is present above the SMA, which is evident from the appearance of green candlesticks, as bulls are trying to maintain their lead. The DOGE/USD pair is facing high volatility as it approaches the $0.101 level. This comparatively increased volatility signals more volatile price movements in the coming hours. The increasing number of buying positions is currently pushing the DOGE price toward the local resistance of $0.106.
The Bollinger Bands have diverged, and the distance between the indicator’s arms is now wide, leading to high volatility levels. This situation signifies increased market movements. The upper Bollinger Band is now at $0.101, which indicates a resistance level. Conversely, the lower Bollinger Band is at $0.0910, showing the support level.
The Fear and Green Index, a price prediction tool, shows a reading of 21 (Extreme Fear); however, the RSI indicator is in the overbought region on the 4-hour chart as well. Over the last four hours, its value has increased to 72. This situation hints at the presence of support from the buying side, and further appreciation seems possible if bulls succeed in a break above the current price level of $0.102.
Dogecoin technical indicators: Levels and action
Daily simple moving average (SMA)
Period
Value ($)
Action
SMA 3
0.09571
BUY
SMA 5
0.09440
BUY
SMA 10
0.09386
BUY
SMA 21
0.09245
BUY
SMA 50
0.09341
BUY
SMA 100
0.1040
SELL
SMA 200
0.1365
SELL
Daily exponential moving average (EMA)
Period
Value ($)
Action
EMA 3
0.09659
BUY
EMA 5
0.09545
BUY
EMA 10
0.09422
BUY
EMA 21
0.09352
BUY
EMA 50
0.09573
BUY
EMA 100
0.1065
SELL
EMA 200
0.1304
SELL
What can you expect from the DOGE price analysis next?
Dogecoin price analysis gives a bullish prediction following current market sentiment, as the coin’s value significantly increased to $0.102 in the past 24 hours. If buyers keep dominating and overwhelm the market, DOGE’s price might trigger further gains and retest the $0.106 resistance. Conversely, if the bearish trend revives, the meme coin may dip toward the $0.0908 support zone.
Is DOGE a good investment?
Dogecoin has strong potential for growth due to its high adoption and strong community. However, DOGE is highly volatile, and its unlimited supply raises questions about its future price. Social media news and trends also highly affect the meme coin, so diversification and your own research are advised. The coin is expected to touch the $0.198174–$0.252221 level by 2027.
Why is DOGE up?
DOGE’s price has been trading at $0.102 over the last 24 hours, with buying interest resurging. After the DOGE price found support around local lows, buyers took control and pushed the price toward resistance levels, as the memecoin is now trending in green.
What is the expected value of Dogecoin in 2026?
Dogecoin is expected to trade at an average price of $0.135119 in 2026.
Will DOGE reach $0.50?
If the broader cryptocurrency market turns bullish, DOGE will join the rally. As a meme coin, it runs mostly on positive speculation. It’s expected that the coin will touch this level by November 2030, which makes it worth the effort to explore Dogecoin.
Will DOGE reach $1?
Considering Dogecoin’s current value, $1 is still a far-reaching target. However, robust community support can push this meme coin near $1, but not before 2032. However, this is not investment advice, and one must seek professional consultation or carry out their own research to create an investment strategy. As all cryptocurrency investments carry risk, due to the market volatility that may affect the future performance of the crypto assets.
Will DOGE hit $10?
Despite the risk involved with meme-based crypto pairs like Dogecoin, they can still shoot up on positive momentum. However, the market speculates that DOGE cannot reach the $10 level in the foreseeable future.
How much is $500 worth of Dogecoin right now?
$500 is worth nearly 5,550 DOGE in April; however, this amount changes based on day-to-day price fluctuations.
Does DOGE have a good long-term future?
Most well-known altcoins are trading at lower levels, and looking at DOGE, it’s also trading below its average price of the last year. Currently, the coin is trading below the previous year’s peak price of $0.434, which was observed in January 2025, but the trend is expected to change, and a positive outbreak can be expected. The DOGE/USD pair is expected to reach the $0.702617 mark by 2032, so it can be a good decision to buy Dogecoin, and also holding it for longer can be beneficial.
Recent news/opinions on Dogecoin
Cryptopolitan reported that Dogecoin’s market activity has risen by 28% following reports of a potential SpaceX IPO. Dogecoin’s active addresses rose from 57,000 to 73,000. Usually, an increase in users often signals wider adoption, but the activity has yet to translate into market gains.
Dogecoin price prediction April 2026
In April 2026, DOGE could maintain a trading range of $0.0871 to $0.117. The current Dogecoin price prediction suggests an average price of $0.092.
DOGE price prediction
Minimum price
Average price
Maximum price
DOGE price prediction April 2026
$0.0871
$0.092
$0.117
Dogecoin price prediction 2026
In 2026, DOGE could maintain a trading range of $0.0719 to $0.162142, with an average price of $0.135119.
DOGE price prediction
Minimum price
Average price
Maximum price
DOGE price prediction 2026
$0.0719
$0.135119
$0.162142
Dogecoin price predictions 2027 – 2032
Year
Minimum price
Average price
Maximum price
2027
$0.198174
$0.225198
$0.252221
2028
$0.288253
$0.315277
$0.3423
2029
$0.378332
$0.405356
$0.432379
2030
$0.468411
$0.495435
$0.522459
2031
$0.55849
$0.585514
$0.612538
2032
$0.648569
$0.675593
$0.702617
Dogecoin price prediction 2027
Dogecoin’s forecast for 2027 presents an optimistic outlook for the coin. Traders can expect a maximum price of $0.252221, an average trading price of $0.225198, and a minimum price of $0.198174.
Dogecoin price prediction 2028
In 2028, DOGE could reach a maximum price of $0.3423, an average trading price of $0.315277, and a minimum price of $0.288253, which is quite higher than the current Dogecoin price.
Dogecoin price prediction 2029
According to the Dogecoin price forecast for 2029, traders can expect a maximum price of $0.432379, an average trading price of $0.405356, and a lowest price of $0.378332.
Dogecoin price prediction 2030
Dogecoin’s forecast for 2030 presents a positive outlook for the memecoin. The maximum expected price is $0.522459, with an average trading price of $0.495435. The predicted minimum price for Dogecoin is $0.468411.
Dogecoin price prediction 2031
According to the Dogecoin price forecast for 2031, traders and investors can anticipate a maximum market value of $0.612538, a minimum price of $0.55849, and an average trading price of $0.585514.
Dogecoin price prediction 2032
According to the Dogecoin price forecast for 2032, traders can expect minimum and maximum prices of $0.648569 and $0.702617, and an expected average DOGE price of $0.675593.
Cryptopolitan’s Dogecoin price predictions for 2026 suggest a minimum of $0.0719, an average of $0.135119, and a maximum of $0.162142. Our analysis shows that DOGE could cross $0.730818 by 2032.
Dogecoin historic price sentiment
DOGE price history. Chart by Coinmarketcap
2013 was the beginning of Dogecoin, and it surged to $0.0004 in the first days of trading. By March 2014, the coin attempted a breach of $0.001 but failed, closing the year at $0.0001.
In the subsequent years, Dogecoin faced immense competition from new coins, including Stellar, Neo, and Monero, which dragged the coin’s price further down.
According to the Dogecoin historical market records, it traded in a strict range of $0.002 to $0.0036 for most of 2019.
In January 2021, DOGE saw significant gains, closing the month at $0.037. Subsequently, Dogecoin attained an ATH of $0.7376 on May 8, 2021, but lost 76% of its value, closing the year at $0.1703.
In 2022, Dogecoin maintained an average market price of about $0.07. The coin began trading around $0.08 in 2023 and closed the year at $0.08955, maintaining its market capitalization, as per crypto market records.
In 2024, Dogecoin (DOGE) began consolidating around $0.08, surged above $0.2 during March’s bull run, fluctuated between $0.1011 and $0.1759 through mid-year, spiked to $0.4312 in November, and ended the year at $0.314.
In January 2025, DOGE clocked the highest price of $0.41; however, after shedding 38% value, it stepped down to $0.258 in February.
In March, DOGE’s value decreased further as it dipped to the $0.20 range, and April saw the lowest DOGE price of $0.142. However, in May, the meme coin recovered to the $0.249 mark, as the bearish momentum faded.
On July 20, 2025, Dogecoin peaked at $0.274, and at the start of August, DOGE was trending near $0.214.
At the start of October, Doge was trading above $0.21, and at the start of November, it hovered near $0.187.
By the end of December, the price of the memecoin declined toward $0.122, as Dogecoin’s price movements were in a downward direction mostly.
At the start of 2026, Dogecoin was trading near $0.118, and in March it came down to $0.093; the current DOGE sentiment is bearish.
In April, Dogecoin has been maintaining its price channel and is trending near $0.090 with the current market sentiment tilting towards the bearish side.
Las Vegas, NV — April 20, 2026 — For Immediate Release
People are tired of social media that treats them like a product. Today at Bitcoin 2026, Soapbox announced the public launch of Ditto — a fully customizable, open source social platform that brings the personal web roaring back.
Ditto isn’t just another alternative to X or Bluesky. It’s a hub for the open web, connecting users across Nostr, Bluesky, and Mastodon in one place, with Bitcoin Lightning payments built in natively.
What Makes Ditto Different
Full personalization
Custom themes with colors, backgrounds, fonts, and layouts. Browse community-created themes or build your own. The era of personal, expressive profiles is back.
A hub, not a silo
Follow and interact with users on Bluesky and Mastodon without leaving Ditto. Your feed, your rules, across multiple networks.
Bitcoin-native payments
Creators receive Lightning tips (“zaps”) directly on posts and profiles. Peer to peer, instant, borderless. No payment processor takes a cut.
You own your account
Built on Nostr, users hold their own cryptographic keys. No company can suspend your identity, and you can take your social graph to any compatible app at any time.
Virtual pets — Blobbis
Tamagotchi-style companions that live in your feed. Hatch an egg, raise it through 16 forms, and watch it follow you around the app.
Encrypted letters
Decorated, personal messages with custom stationery, stickers, and 3D animated envelopes.
Build your own microapps
With Shakespeare, anyone can create lightweight apps and publish them directly to the Ditto network. Software as a creative act, powered by AI.
In Their Words
“
“Ditto is a place of creation. An endless garden where thousands of flowers can bloom. People can use Shakespeare.diy to create their own apps, then share them on a social network with Ditto. I want to prove that making software is a form of art. Especially with AI.”
Alex GleasonFounder, Soapbox — Former Head of Engineering, Truth Social
Open Source & Decentralized
Ditto applies the same principles that made Bitcoin unstoppable to social communication. Just as Bitcoin removed trusted intermediaries from money, Nostr removes them from speech. Your key is yours — no platform can revoke it.
Ditto is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and the full source code is available on GitLab. Anyone can read, copy, improve, or self-host their own instance. Documentation is available at about.ditto.pub.
About & Contact
About Soapbox
Founded by Alex Gleason, former Head of Engineering at Truth Social. Soapbox builds open source tools for the decentralized web, funded by grants and donations from OpenSats and the Human Rights Foundation. No ads, no investors, no data sales.
This press release is distributed by Crypto Coin Show (cryptocoinshow.com) as part of its coverage of the Bitcoin 2026 conference and the broader digital asset and decentralized technology ecosystem. CCS does not independently verify claims made in press releases. For full details and media assets visit soapbox.pub.
Russian bankers are now urging their government to soften upcoming crypto rules and admit more coins to the country’s market for digital assets.
Their call comes after lawmakers warned against the overly strict framework currently under review, suggesting regulation in line with global standards.
Russian banks push for liberal cryptocurrency law
The Association of Russian Banks (ARB) has come up with ideas on how to “liberalize” the pending bill “On Digital Currency and Digital Rights.”
The draft law is part of a legislative package meant to comprehensively regulate crypto operations in Russia which is under consideration in the State Duma.
It legalizes cryptocurrencies and platforms working with them but imposes restrictions and penalties threatening to cut off Russia from the global market.
The proposals have been sent to the Chairman of the Financial Markets Committee at the lower house of Russian parliament, Anatoly Aksakov, local media unveiled.
According to reports by RBC and Bits.media, the ARB lobbies for allowing transfers to non-custodial wallets abroad and whitelisting foreign crypto platforms.
Such transactions would be illegal under the current version of the law, which permits only sending coins to custodial wallets and via licensed domestic intermediaries.
The banks, which will be authorized to work with decentralized money, want to be able to exchange cryptocurrencies for Russian digital financial assets such as tokenized securities.
They also suggest regulating stablecoins pegged to fiat currencies or backed by other assets, which are not mentioned in the legislation right now.
Russian bankers are also pushing the country’s monetary authority to relax the standards for cryptocurrencies approved for trading in the country.
The bill admits only the largest coins by capitalization and liquidity to the Russian market, such as Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Solana, as reported by Cryptopolitan.
The ARB further proposes ditching a requirement for digital depositories to disclose information about clients and their crypto holdings.
It also insists on extending judicial protection to cover crypto assets, including those that have not been disclosed to Russia’s tax authority.
Amendments can be made until the second reading of the bill, which was filed in the Duma earlier in April but has yet to hit the floor of the chamber.
Lawmakers call for easing crypto regulations
Meanwhile, the draft law was recently reviewed by the parliamentary Committee for Protection of Competition, and its members were also unhappy with its “excessive rigidity.”
The Russian deputies called for easing the rules for members of the industry, warning they would otherwise lead to monopolization of the market.
“Excessively stringent regulation compared to global regulatory practices may not achieve the bill’s goals,” the legislators remarked in their conclusion.
One of them is to bring the sector out of the shadows, but many Russians may opt to remain under the radar if the framework is adopted as is. The members of the Duma wrote:
“Instead of creating an effective and sustainable digital currency market in the Russian Federation, this could trigger an outflow of retail investors, who will be forced to choose between foreign platforms with more lenient regulations or remain in the gray zone of the domestic market, unwilling to use monopolists’ services under unfavorable terms.”
The other stated goals include introducing requirements for entities processing crypto transactions, such as exchanges and custodians.
Increasing market transparency and developing standards for provided services and investor protection are among the announced priorities, too.
The committee emphasized it has no objections to the need to achieve all this, but made it clear it’s concerned about other aspects of the legislation.
For example, it criticized the strict licensing requirements for crypto companies, including regarding capital, cybersecurity, and corporate transparency.
These will banish small and medium-sized participants from the market, leaving only large players like banks, depositories, and other financial institutions.
Under the currently proposed rules, only the latter will be able to gain full access to cryptocurrency transactions, which would allow them to monopolize the market.
This level of “centralization often leads to the disappearance of innovative startups and creates the risk of high fees,” the lawmakers warned.
They also fear “reduced quality of services and a lack of incentives for the development of new technological solutions.”
The “Digital Currency” bill must be adopted by July 1, 2026. Other acts, introducing fines and penalties for breaking the law, will be enforced a year later.
According to the latest official update, the third large-scale buyback and burn of JST has been completed. In this round, 271,337,579 JST tokens, worth an estimated $21.3 million, were burned, representing 2.74% of the total supply. Every dollar deployed in this round originated directly from the organic revenue of JustLend DAO. This includes approximately $10.34 million drawn from accumulated revenue, paired with $10.97 million in net new revenue generated during Q1 2026.
This milestone marks the completion of three massive buyback-and-burn cycles. Since its launch in October 2025, this program has burned 1,356,228,332 JST tokens in just six months, slashing the total supply by ~13.70%.
On the execution front, Grants DAO spearheaded the entire process on-chain. This fully decentralized operation ensures that every transaction is publicly traceable. Community members can monitor the capital deployed, tokens burned, and transaction hashes in real time through the JustLend DAO’s transparency page—offering absolute transparency at every stage.
JST Supply Shrinks by 1.36 Billion Following Three Rounds of Buyback and Burn: Token Price and Market Cap Propelled by Deflationary Drivers
Since the October 2025 launch of its buyback and burn initiative, JST has successfully completed three massive rounds of supply reductions. The data for all three rounds is fully transparent and verifiable on-chain:
Round 1 (Oct 2025): 559 million JST burned via a $17.72 million capital commitment, representing 5.66% of total supply.
Round 2 (Jan 2026): 525 million JST burned via a $21 million capital commitment, representing 5.3% of total supply.
Round 3 (Apr 15, 2026): Approx. 271 million JST burned via a $21.3 million capital commitment, representing 2.74% of total supply.
Through these three massive burns, 1,356,228,332 JST have been permanently removed from the total supply, slashing the token base by 13.7%. This intensifying deflationary pressure has rapidly accelerated JST’s scarcity. With a fixed total supply and stable demand, this supply-side contraction is triggering a fundamental token revaluation, clearing the way for sustained growth in both token price and market capitalization.
JST’s market performance is another powerful validation of this deflationary logic. According to CoinGecko’s data, since the buyback program commenced in October 2025, JST’s price has surged from a low of ~$0.03 to $0.08, representing an over 100% upsurge. Over the same period, its market cap has jumped from $300 million to ~$700 million, signaling robust investor confidence. As this deflationary mechanism becomes a structural fixture of the ecosystem, the ongoing contraction of circulating supply is expected to drive JST’s valuation up in the long run.
The momentum behind JST’s buyback and burn program comes from the strong fundamentals of JustLend DAO. Per protocol, JST burn capital is sourced from two pillars of the JUST ecosystem: the net revenue of the JustLend DAO platform and incremental earnings from the USDD ecosystem above the $10 million revenue threshold. Since USDD’s revenue is yet to hit the threshold, all funding for the first three burns has been derived from the organic revenue generated by JustLend DAO.
Financial deployment for these three rounds has scaled progressively, shattering market expectations. This trajectory stems directly from JustLend DAO’s high profitability and sophisticated operational framework.
As the cornerstone of TRON’s financial infrastructure, JustLend DAO has engineered a diversified product matrix—including SBM lending, sTRX liquid staking, energy rental, and the GasFree smart wallet—to provide stable, multifaceted support for ecosystem earnings. Currently, SBM lending and sTRX business lines serve as the primary engines for JST burn funding.
Through this comprehensive lineup, JustLend DAO has achieved consistent revenue growth and demonstrated resilience across market cycles. With a Total Value Locked (TVL) of approximately $6.75 billion, its SBM lending business is consistently ranked among the top three globally in the sector.
Driven by this organic revenue, the JST buyback and burn flywheel is operating with high efficiency. This intensifying deflationary pressure will persist across both bull and bear markets, forging a solid foundation for JST’s long-term value appreciation.
Disclaimer: This is a sponsored post. CryptoSlate does not endorse any of the projects mentioned in this article. Investors are encouraged to perform necessary due diligence.
Europe’s top competition authority has moved to strip Google of its iron grip over online search data, ordering the company to open up the information it collects to competing search engines and artificial intelligence services.
Under the proposal, Google would have to let outside search engines access the data it gathers on rankings, user queries, clicks, and page views.
The company would have to offer this access on terms that are fair, reasonable, and consistent across the board.
The goal, according to the Commission’s official report, is to give competing services a real shot at improving and eventually challenging Google’s hold on the search market.
Teresa Ribera, who serves as Executive Vice-President for Clean, Just and Competitive Transition, explained the thinking behind the move.
“Data is a key input for online search and for developing new services, including AI. Access to this data should not be restricted in ways that could harm competition. In fast-moving markets, small changes can quickly have a big impact. We will not allow practices that risk closing markets or limiting choice,” she said.
The proposal, published on April 16, 2026, covers six areas: who qualifies to receive the data, including whether AI chatbots that carry out search functions count; what data gets shared; how and how often it gets handed over; steps to protect the privacy of personal data; how pricing would work; and rules for managing access.
Google fights back over privacy concerns
The decision to include AI chatbots is a clear sign that Brussels sees these tools as direct competitors to traditional search.
Google has spent decades building up a store of user behavior data that no rival has been able to match. That stockpile now sits at the center of a major legal fight.
Google was formally charged in March 2025 with breaking the Digital Markets Act. The company has since pushed back hard against the latest proposals.
Clare Kelly, Google’s senior competition counsel, said the company would challenge the measures, calling them a stretch far beyond what the law was ever meant to require.
“Hundreds of millions of Europeans trust Google with their most sensitive searches, including private questions about their health, family, and finances, and the Commission’s proposal would force us to hand this data over to third parties, with dangerously ineffective privacy protections,” Kelly said.
The company also accused some of the pressure behind the investigation of coming from rivals looking to take its data, and warned that the privacy protections being proposed would not hold up.
Fines and a final deadline loom
The findings released Thursday sit roughly halfway through a formal process that the Commission started on January 27, 2026.
This process is designed to spell out exactly how a company must meet its legal obligations, rather than jumping straight to a penalty ruling. Still, the stakes are serious.
If Google fails to meet whatever final requirements are set, it could face fines worth up to ten percent of Alphabet’s total global revenue for a year, a figure that could top 35 billion dollars.
Henna Virkkunen, Executive Vice-President for Tech Sovereignty, Security and Democracy, said in the official report that the push is happening at a “crucial moment of growing interconnection with AI services.”
A public consultation period opens Friday, April 17, 2026, and anyone who wants to weigh in has until May 1 to do so. The Commission plans to issue a final, binding ruling by July 27, 2026.
The case is seen as a test of whether Europe can actually force a global technology company to open its most closely guarded assets.
Krown Technologies and Quantum eMotion
Announce Exclusive Partnership
Mutual Exclusivity and QRNG2 Integration Position Both Companies at the Forefront of Crypto Security Amid Rising Quantum Threats
DateApril 15, 2026
LocationMonroe, LA, United States
SourceKrown Technologies, Ltd. via EINPresswire
Krown Technologieskrown.network
×
Quantum eMotionNYSE: QNC · TSXV: QNC.V
Monroe, LA — April 15, 2026 —
Krown Technologies, Inc., a pioneer in quantum-secure blockchain infrastructure, has announced a mutual, exclusive, strategic partnership with Quantum eMotion Corp. (NYSE: QNC) — a leader in quantum random number generation technology — to deploy next-generation quantum-secure technologies across the global digital asset ecosystem.
The agreement establishes a mutual exclusivity framework within the cryptocurrency and blockchain sectors, aligning both companies in a focused effort to address one of the most pressing long-term security challenges facing the digital asset industry: the threat posed by quantum computing to widely-used cryptographic systems.
Partnership Terms
Exclusivity Framework
Krown has secured an exclusive, worldwide license to utilize, commercialize, resell, and white-label Quantum eMotion’s QRNG2 technology and full-stack quantum encryption solutions across blockchain networks, DeFi platforms, wallets, and related infrastructure.
Krown has committed to Quantum eMotion as its sole provider of quantum-based security technologies within the crypto sector.
Krown Technologies has designated Quantum eMotion as its Official Quantum Security Partner.
Quantum eMotion has named Krown its Official Quantum Blockchain Partner.
The collaboration is supported by defined commercialization timelines and performance-based review milestones.
Krown Ecosystem Integration
The partnership will accelerate co-development across Krown’s expanding platform suite, with QRNG2 quantum entropy integrated across the following products and services:
Qastle Wallet
Excalibur Hardware Wallet
Krown Quantum Blockchain
QBaaS (Blockchain-as-a-Service)
QeMail
Emerging Platforms
Both companies will also collaborate on the development of new QRNG2-powered products and services designed to enhance security across the global cryptocurrency landscape.
The Quantum Security Context
As digital assets continue to scale globally, industry attention is increasingly shifting toward long-term security risks. Research from major technology organizations — including Google — has highlighted the potential vulnerability of widely used cryptographic systems in a future shaped by quantum computing.
By integrating QRNG2 technology, which leverages true quantum entropy, into blockchain and wallet infrastructure, the partnership aims to strengthen cryptographic resilience and support more secure digital asset ecosystems moving forward.
The collaboration follows Krown’s recently announced strategic partnership with BTC Inc., the parent company of Bitcoin Magazine and The Bitcoin Conference, providing a significant global platform for the adoption and visibility of quantum-secure technologies within the digital asset industry.
Leadership Commentary
“Securing the crypto industry against quantum threats requires the strongest possible foundation of true randomness. This partnership enables us to integrate quantum entropy directly into our infrastructure while accelerating the development of long-term security solutions for digital assets.”
James StephensCEO, Krown Technologies, Inc.
“This collaboration represents a strategic step in positioning quantum-based security at the foundation of the digital asset ecosystem. The mutual exclusivity reflects a strong commitment from both organizations while supporting disciplined execution and long-term growth.”
Francis BellidoCEO, Quantum eMotion Corp.
About the Companies
Krown Technologies Inc.
A blockchain infrastructure company developing Krown Network — an ecosystem focused on decentralized finance, digital asset infrastructure, and cross-chain interoperability. The Krown ecosystem includes blockchain platforms for digital asset trading, decentralized applications, and secure wallet technology, including the KROWN native token, KrownDEX decentralized exchange, and Qastle Wallet.
A publicly traded company pioneering quantum-safe cybersecurity solutions powered by its proprietary QRNG technology. Its QRNG2 platform delivers true quantum entropy, enabling secure key generation and cryptographic operations across blockchain, financial systems, and enterprise applications. Targets financial services, healthcare, blockchain, government systems, IoT, and quantum cryptography.
Legal Disclaimer: This press release is distributed via EINPresswire and is provided “as is” without warranty of any kind. Crypto Coin Show distributes this release as part of its media coverage of the digital asset industry and does not independently verify the claims made herein.
Higlobe Arriving in India — Zero Fees, Instant Dollars
Global Payments · Stablecoins · Emerging Markets
Higlobe Arriving in India — Zero Fees, Instant Dollars, and the End of the 6% Transfer Tax
The San Francisco fintech that pioneered stablecoin-native payments is bringing its lowest-cost guarantee to one billion global south users — starting with the world’s most globalized diaspora.
AA
Ashton Addison
Founder & CEO · Crypto Coin Show · Since 2014
9 April 2026
For most of the last decade, sending money across a border has meant choosing between speed and cost — and losing on both. Bank wires: five days, six percent. PayPal and Stripe: faster, but the fee is baked into the exchange rate. Stablecoin wallets bolted onto old rails: crypto in, SWIFT out, same problem. Higlobe was built to eliminate all three of those compromises — and it is now bringing that infrastructure to India.
The company is launching in India within days, becoming the first stablecoin provider with direct local rails into the Indian market. The move is significant not just for its scale but for its structure: India’s government permits citizens to invest up to $250,000 USD overseas — a legal opening that does not exist in Brazil or Mexico, two of Higlobe’s existing markets. Combined with the most globally distributed diaspora of any country on earth, India represents a structural opportunity unlike any the company has entered before.
“Waiting lists are bursting at the seams,” said Teymour Farman-Farmaian, Co-founder and CEO of Higlobe. “We’ll be the first stablecoin provider linked into India. Zero fees. USD in, rupees out.”
Higlobe · Key Metrics · April 2026
Active Markets
6
Transfer Time
<60s
Average User Monthly Volume
$5,000 – $6,000
Transfer Fees
Zero — lowest cost guaranteed
Compliance
SOC2 Type 2 · FinCEN MSB Registered
Infrastructure
Dual bank partners · Crypto-native rails
I.The Problem
Why the Old Rails Keep Failing
The traditional cross-border payment system wasn’t designed to fail — it was designed to profit. Banks maintain local currency balances in target markets, a model called netting, which allows faster settlement but requires significant capital. That capital cost flows directly to the user as a percentage fee. The result: industry averages above six percent per transfer, a rate the UN targeted at three percent in 2015 and has never seen met.
Newer entrants like Wise and Revolut compressed fees somewhat but never restructured the underlying incentive. They still make money on the transfer — which means the fee can go lower, but never to zero. PayPal, which processes hundreds of billions in cross-border volume, faces the same constraint. Its shareholders expect per-transfer margin. That model works until a competitor prices it into obsolescence.
“Technology moves faster than the business model. PayPal will keep minting money on the old rails until a competitor takes enough market share — then capitulate. Exactly what happened with music streaming.”
Farman-Farmaian reaches for Clay Christensen’s definition of disruptive technology: cheaper, worse at first, makes money differently. Kazaa gave away music in 2000. Spotify monetized it through subscription in 2005. Apple kept charging 99 cents per download until 2015 — minting profit for a decade before capitulating. Stablecoins were invented in 2014 by Tether. The Genius Act legitimized them in March 2025. “Same arc,” he said. “Five years to the capitulation.”
II.The Architecture
Built Crypto-Native From the Start
Higlobe’s core insight dates to 2019. Farman-Farmaian — who describes himself as “Two Revolution Teymour,” having lived through the Iranian and Venezuelan revolutions and watched family wealth erased twice — made a decision the rest of the industry hadn’t yet reached: go all-in on stablecoin end-to-end. No hybrid. No SWIFT fallback. Crypto-native rails, country by country.
Most competitors, he argues, missed the point entirely. “They slap a stablecoin wallet onto old-world rails. You get paid in stablecoin, but to cash out it goes through SWIFT — five days, three percent fee.” Higlobe builds direct fiat on- and off-ramps at the market level, partnering with local crypto exchanges in each country. Users never see a stablecoin interface. They put money in and it appears as US dollars, instantly, at near-zero cost.
Factor
Legacy Model
Higlobe
Transfer time
1–5 business days
Under 60 seconds
Transfer fee
3–6% (often in FX spread)
Zero — lowest cost guaranteed
Rail architecture
Correspondent banking / netting
Crypto-native, local exchange partnerships
Revenue model
Per-transfer margin
FX, debit card, yield, loans, subscription
User experience
Multi-step, multi-platform
Single interface, no crypto knowledge needed
The lowest-cost guarantee is contractual: if a user finds a better rate anywhere and sends a screenshot, Higlobe returns the full transfer plus a “headache bonus” within 48 hours. It is a structural bet, not a marketing claim.
III.The Business Model
How You Build a Billion-Dollar Business Without Charging for Transfers
When the marginal cost of moving money through a stablecoin rail reaches near zero, the pricing of that transfer trends to zero. Fighting that trajectory — as PayPal and Wise do today — is a posture, not a strategy. Higlobe was built from the start to monetize the relationship, not the transaction.
Revenue today comes from four sources: foreign exchange spread optimization on currency conversion, debit card interchange, yield on user deposits placed with yield providers at three to four percent APY, and loans currently in testing against US receivables. The long-term model points to subscription — a bundled product giving users unlimited access to transfers, jobs, financial services, and lending in a single monthly fee. The analogy Farman-Farmaian returns to is Amazon: retail is the relationship hook, but Prime, advertising, and AWS are where the margin lives.
On yield: Higlobe automatically places user dollar deposits with yield providers at 3–4% APY. For users whose local currency loses 10% or more per month against the dollar — as is common across Latin America — the yield is almost secondary to the stability of simply holding dollars at all.
IV.The India Launch
Why India Changes Everything
Each of Higlobe’s six markets required a country-specific build: local exchange partnerships, regulatory licensing, and on-the-ground compliance infrastructure. The company’s deliberate choice to go six countries deep rather than 150 countries wide is the source of its structural cost advantage — and its defensibility.
India is different in three ways that compound. First, India’s Liberalised Remittance Scheme permits citizens to remit up to $250,000 USD overseas per year — a legal channel unavailable in comparable form in Brazil or Mexico. Second, the Indian diaspora is the most globally distributed of any nation, with large communities in the United States, United Kingdom, Canada, the Gulf, Southeast Asia, and Africa. Third, India’s tech sector has a deep structural connection to the US — software engineers, exporters, and remote workers are exactly the high-volume professional users Higlobe built its first four years around.
Individual onboarding is complete in under 24 hours. From there: dollars arrive, are automatically placed on yield, can be spent on Higlobe’s debit card, and can be withdrawn to a local bank account in rupees — without the user ever interacting with a crypto interface.
Blockchain Interviews · Crypto Coin Show
Teymour Farman-Farmaian, Co-founder & CEO · Higlobe · 9 April 2026
Full Interview
Selected Excerpts
Q Most stablecoin competitors still route cash-outs through SWIFT. What did Higlobe figure out that they didn’t?
We go country by country and work with the best local exchanges for a seamless interface. Our users move in and out of dollars without even knowing it. Instant. No fee. When friction is taken out, growth occurs. That’s what we’ve seen.
Q If you’re not making money on transfers, where does revenue actually come from?
Think of Amazon. It doesn’t make money on retail — it makes money on Prime, ads, and AWS. Move money is the relationship hook. Real revenue is the services around it: FX trading, debit card, yield, loans. We’ll end up with a Spotify-like subscription — unlimited access to jobs, loans, transfers.
Q What makes India different from your other markets?
India allows overseas investment up to $250,000 per person — Brazil and Mexico don’t. The Indian diaspora is the most globalized in the world. We’ll be the first stablecoin provider linked into India. Zero fees, USD in, rupees out. Waiting lists are bursting at the seams.
Q How does the lowest-cost guarantee actually work?
If you think you got a better price somewhere, email us a screenshot and you’ll get your money back plus a headache bonus within 48 hours. We make money differently — so moving money is covered at cost only. We don’t do 150 countries with Frankenstein stablecoin-on-old-rails. We do six countries with the best rails.
Higlobe is currently live in Argentina, Colombia, Brazil, Mexico, the Philippines and India. Sign up and access the lowest-cost guarantee at higlobe.com.
This article draws on an interview conducted by Ashton Addison, Crypto Coin Show, with Teymour Farman-Farmaian, Co-founder and CEO of Higlobe, on 9 April 2026. The full interview is available on the Crypto Coin Show YouTube channel.
