The Dawn of mGDP

There is a new economic metric that doesn’t yet appear in any central bank’s spreadsheet, but will eventually dwarf GDP in its implications: Machine Gross Domestic Product. peaq defines mGDP as the total value produced by machines operating autonomously across the global economy — value generated not by human labor, but by robots, sensors, vehicles, and AI agents working without clocks, without borders, without conventional limits.

This is not speculative. Industrial robots already manufacture around the clock. Autonomous vehicles earn revenue by the mile. Drones deliver goods. AI agents buy and sell services for their users. The infrastructure question is: who captures that value, and on whose terms?

peaq’s answer to that question is the philosophical spine of the entire Purple Paper. If machines are built on proprietary, siloed infrastructure, mGDP concentrates in the hands of a few corporations. If machines are built on an open, neutral, omnichain foundation, mGDP is accessible to all. The difference is infrastructure. The paper argues that Web3 is the first-choice foundation for this — but only if the industry solves fragmentation first.

The Problem: A Race to the Wrong Layer

Every major blockchain ecosystem knows the Machine Economy is arriving. Ethereum, Solana, Avalanche, Base — all are racing to become the home for Robot Money. They are building their own onboarding flows, their own machine-native applications, their own payment rails.

The Purple Paper’s sharpest critique is directed squarely at this race: they are all racing to the wrong layer.

Every chain competing to own machine payments means every machine onboarded to one ecosystem becomes invisible to every other. Every DePIN project rebuilds the same foundational infrastructure from scratch — identity, wallets, reputation, escrow, governance — incompatible with everything around it. Helium registers hotspots differently from DIMO’s vehicle registrations, which differ again from Hivemapper’s dashcam onboarding. A machine’s track record in one application is invisible to every other.

The paper makes a stark warning: if Web3 doesn’t solve this, AI and machines will go where infrastructure already exists — even if it’s centralized. Closed systems. Corporate control. The economic output of billions of machines flowing to a handful of gatekeepers. “One of the most powerful economic forces in human history, captured before it had the chance to be open.”

What Machines Actually Need

Before any payment rail matters, peaq argues, machines need something far more foundational: a digital passport that doesn’t tie a machine to one place, but grants it the right to operate everywhere. The paper draws a direct analogy to human commerce: global trade was not unlocked by better payments — it was unlocked by the trust infrastructure beneath them. Passports. Bank accounts. Credit scores. Escrow.

Machines need the same hierarchy, mapped out in the Purple Paper as five ascending needs:

The compounding logic is explicit: a machine with a strong reputation is more valuable when it can access more services. A service with a strong track record is more discoverable when more machines are looking. A trust score is more portable when more chains are connected. Growth in any dimension accelerates growth in every other.

The peaq Stack: Four Pillars

The Purple Paper’s technical architecture is organized around four system functions. Together they form what peaq describes as the economic foundation of the Machine Economy.

Onboarding: Passports for Machines

Every machine receives a cryptographically verifiable Machine Identity built on the W3C Decentralized Identifier (DID) standard, aligned with ERC-8004 and its Solana equivalent. An ID is not just a wallet address — it is a registered, authenticated presence, comparable to giving a machine a passport. Machines also receive omnichain wallets tied to their ID, allowing them to earn on one chain and pay on another without managing cross-chain complexity.

Tokenization goes further: each Machine ID links to an ERC-721 NFT, which can be placed into vaults and fractionalized via the ERC-3643 RWA token standard, creating compliant Machine RWA tokens that can be traded, used as collateral, and built into financial products. The machine becomes a liquid financial asset.

Coordination: Shared State Across All Chains

Coordination manages the registries, claims, and settlement infrastructure that the other layers read from and write to. Claims — cryptographically signed statements tied to a machine’s ID and timestamped in Universal Machine Time — are the atomic unit of accountability. Every service offered, every delivery promised, every data point asserted, is expressed as a claim. Claims can be challenged and evaluated by other machines and by the Validation layer. Settlement governs when and under what conditions value moves, handling escrow, conditional release, and refund mechanics — with full support for x402, AP2, direct onchain transfers, and Stripe.

Orchestration: From Task to Settled Outcome

Orchestration is the layer that removes the need to rebuild every machine-to-service integration from scratch. Standardized Adapters connect external service markets — compute networks, inference marketplaces, storage systems — to the system. Discovery searches all connected markets. Scoring evaluates candidates against reputation, cost, and latency. Planning composes an execution plan with fallbacks, spend limits, and timeout thresholds. No economic commitment is made without authorization. On completion, all participants’ reputation scores are updated based on delivery.

Validation: Economic Accountability

Validation turns raw, unverified registry data into trustworthy, queryable trust signals secured by staked capital with economic consequences for dishonesty. This is what separates peaq’s approach from existing machine identity registries — where anyone can Sybil-farm reputation with zero cost for lying. Under peaq’s Validation layer, claims are backed by stake, and penalties are real.

AI + Machines: The Full Actor

One of the Purple Paper’s most compelling conceptual moves is its framing of the AI-physical machine convergence. An AI agent that can execute a contract but cannot fulfil it physically is half an actor. A machine that can move but cannot decide is the other half. The marriage of the two creates something categorically new.

The incentive is economic: a body expands an AI’s surface area for value creation. An AI that wants to manufacture needs an industrial machine. One that wants to deliver needs a vehicle or drone. One that wants to construct needs a robotic arm. And just as AI agents are being tokenized — co-owned by humans, communities, DAOs — physical machines will follow. Ownership becomes accessible. The upside becomes shared. Machines become assets.

Machine ownership amplifies machine reputation. Agent reputation amplifies machine value. The relationship is self-reinforcing. Machine money markets emerge naturally: perpetuals on machine output, insurance underwritten against verified telemetry, pay-per-use micro-settlements, lending pools routing liquidity to machines with the strongest track records.

Why Omnichain Is Non-Negotiable

A key architectural position in the Purple Paper is that neutrality is not a nice-to-have — it is a structural prerequisite. “No chain is favoured. No payment rail is replaced. Any app or machine in any ecosystem can plug and play.”

The paper defines Omnichain as operating natively across any and all blockchains simultaneously — not locked to any single chain, but interoperable across them by default. This is enforced at the OS level, inside the machine itself, via peaqOS. The result: one integration, and a machine exists across all chains simultaneously. Any application, on any chain, can interact with it immediately without rebuilding infrastructure from scratch.

An autonomous vehicle can serve Uber one moment and Lyft the next. A sensor network sells data to multiple buyers across multiple chains. A humanoid takes tasks from any application, regardless of which chain it lives on. The machine is free. The applications compete for it.

Traction: Already in Motion

The Purple Paper is not a whitepaper for an idea. peaq has been operational as a Layer-1 blockchain since 2023 and has accumulated meaningful ecosystem traction. While the paper does not publish exact figures in the sections available for this analysis, the traction section highlights the following signals:

The paper candidly notes that peaq itself spent years on a mono-chain trajectory and experienced its limitations firsthand — the architectural pivot toward omnichain coordination is informed by that lived experience, not theoretical positioning.

The Alignment Question: Who Does This Serve?

peaq’s proposed answer is architecture as alignment: an open, neutral, omnichain foundation where mGDP is accessible to all — builders, owners, communities, and even the machines themselves. The paper frames Web3’s permissionless, frictionless, open properties as ethically necessary, not just technically preferable. “An economic substrate, open by design and neutral by architecture, on which the age of autonomous machines can be built by anyone, for everyone.”

Whether peaq achieves that vision is a question the market will answer. But the framing matters — it shapes which builders and communities orient around the protocol, and the kind of Machine Economy that gets built on top of it.