All-New Waymo Robotaxi Finally Debuts
The new self-driving vehicle took four years from concept to execution.
The new self-driving vehicle took four years from concept to execution.
Key takeaways:
Cosmos (ATOM) is a blockchain ecosystem that facilitates interoperability among independent blockchains. Co-founded by Jae Kwon and Ethan Buchman in 2014, Cosmos aims to create a decentralized network of blockchains that can communicate and transact seamlessly. Its main components include the Cosmos Hub, the central chain, and multiple “zones” that operate under their own rules while connecting to the Hub.
The platform uses the Tendermint consensus algorithm and Inter-Blockchain Communication (IBC) protocol to enable fast, low-cost transactions. Fees average around $0.01, and confirmation times are approximately seven seconds. Cosmos employs a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) mechanism, enabling users to stake ATOM tokens to secure the network and validate transactions.
Since its ICO in 2017, Cosmos has raised significant funding and established a growing ecosystem, including notable projects like Terra and Binance. With over 286 million ATOM tokens in circulation and a market cap exceeding $7.7 billion, Cosmos is positioned as a key player in the evolving landscape of blockchain technology, often referred to as the “Internet of Blockchains” for its ambitious goal of connecting diverse blockchain networks.
| Cryptocurrency | Cosmos |
| Token | ATOM |
| Current Price | $2.01 |
| Market Cap | $1.02B |
| Trading Volume (24-hour) | $43.72M |
| Circulating Supply | 465.48M ATOM |
| All-time High | $ 44.70 on Sept 19, 2021 |
| All-time Low | $1.13 on Mar 12, 2020 |
| 24-hour High | $2.08 |
| 24-hour Low | $1.99 |
| Metric | Value |
| Price Volatility (30-day variation) | $ 1.91 (-5.93%) |
| 50-Day SMA | $ 1.87 |
| 14-Day RSI | 57.12 (Neutral) |
| Sentiment | Bearish |
| Fear & Greed Index | 27 (Fear) |
| Green Days | 16/30 (53%) |
| 200-Day SMA | $2.12 |
TL; DR Breakdown:

ATOM is trading at $2.0107, down 1.85% on the day, struggling to hold above the key $2.00 psychological level after a brief push toward $2.20 in early May. The daily chart reveals a highly volatile structure with multiple failed recovery attempts, including peaks near $2.70 in January and $2.50 in March, both of which reversed sharply. The price is now hovering just above the red horizontal support at around $2.00, which has been tested repeatedly since February. Holding above $2.00 is critical for bulls, as a break below it risks a swift move toward $1.80 and $1.60. A daily close above $2.20 is needed to restore any meaningful bullish momentum heading into June.

ATOM is trading at $2.0087, up 0.79%, with the 4-hour chart showing a choppy and indecisive structure that has persisted since February. Price has been oscillating between $1.80 and $2.20 in a wide, messy range with no clear directional bias. The recent push toward $2.20 in early May was quickly rejected, pulling price back toward the dotted horizontal support around $2.00. Every recovery attempt continues to get sold into, maintaining the broader pattern of lower highs. Bulls need a clean 4-hour close above $2.20 to break this cycle and target $2.40, while a loss of $1.90 risks a swift move back toward $1.80 and $1.60.
| Period | Value | Action |
| SMA 3 | $ 2.05 | SELL |
| SMA 5 | $ 2.02 | SELL |
| SMA 10 | $ 2.04 | SELL |
| SMA 21 | $ 1.97 | BUY |
| SMA 50 | $ 1.87 | BUY |
| SMA 100 | $ 1.90 | BUY |
| SMA 200 | $ 2.12 | SELL |
| Period | Value | Action |
| EMA 3 | $ 2.04 | SELL |
| EMA 5 | $ 2.04 | SELL |
| EMA 10 | $ 2.02 | SELL |
| EMA 21 | $ 1.98 | BUY |
| EMA 50 | $ 1.93 | BUY |
| EMA 100 | $ 1.98 | BUY |
| EMA 200 | $2.30 | SELL |
Based on the current structure across both the daily and 4-hour charts, ATOM is at a critical juncture around the $2.00 psychological level that has been tested repeatedly without a decisive break in either direction. The persistent pattern of lower highs since January and multiple failed recovery attempts above $2.20 suggest sellers remain firmly in control at higher levels. The next significant move will depend on whether bulls can convincingly defend $1.90 support.
A break and hold above $2.20 would open the path toward $2.40 and $2.50, while a loss of $1.90 risks a deeper decline toward $1.60 and potentially the February lows near $1.40. The IBC Eureka upgrade and Tokenomics 2.0 implementation remain the key fundamental catalysts that could finally shift sentiment and trigger a sustained breakout above the range ATOM has been trapped in since early 2026.
ATOM is down today due to a mix of fundamental and macro pressures. The Fear and Greed Index sits at 25, signaling extreme fear across the broader crypto market, which is pulling high-beta altcoins like ATOM lower alongside Bitcoin’s weakness. On the fundamental side, the Cosmos ecosystem continues to bleed projects, with no native DEX replacing Osmosis going into maintenance mode, no native stablecoin replacing Noble’s exit, no Eureka IBC V2 to Solana, and no native money market replacing Mars closing, leaving the ecosystem increasingly hollow. ATOM’s 4-hour chart also remains bearish with the 50-day moving average falling, compounding selling pressure and keeping any recovery attempts short-lived.
Cosmos (ATOM) shows potential as an investment due to its innovative approach to blockchain interoperability and recent upgrades, such as ATOM 2.0. Analysts predict long-term price growth, but the crypto market is highly volatile. Investors should conduct their research and consider risks before investing in ATOM.
The Cosmos network is built on the Tendermint consensus protocol, offering robust security and interoperability features. However, like all blockchain systems, it faces potential risks, requiring users to remain cautious and well-informed about emerging vulnerabilities and challenges.
Based on Cosmos’ current market trends and growth projections, Cosmos (ATOM) is expected to reach a value of approximately $13.87 by 2030.
Current predictions suggest that Cosmos (ATOM) will likely reach $51.9 in 2033. Analysts estimate it would require a significant increase of over 900% to hit that price.
Cosmos (ATOM) promises a strong long-term future, with forecasts indicating significant price increases over the next decade. Analysts predict that ATOM could reach $13.87 by 2030, driven by its unique position in the blockchain ecosystem and ongoing developments in interoperability and scalability. The Cosmos Hub is well established and supported by a dedicated community, which enhances its growth and adoption prospects in the evolving cryptocurrency landscape. Thus, the Cosmos network could expand its user base.
Cosmos IBC Protocol positions Interchain Stack as the bridge between legacy systems and blockchain infrastructure
Cosmos highlights its IBC protocol as the key solution for institutions seeking to upgrade their digital capabilities without abandoning decades of existing embedded infrastructure.
As of May 2026, Cosmos (ATOM) is forecast to trade between $1.96 and $2.83, with an average of $2.34
| Month | Potential Low | Potential Average | Potential High |
| May 2026 | $1.96 | $2.34 | $2.83 |
According to our deep technical analysis of past ATOM price data, in 2026, the price of Cosmos is forecast to range from a low of $6.02 to a high of $7.76, with an average trading price of $7.00. This projection is supported by moderate ecosystem growth, continued adoption of IBC for cross-chain communication, and consistent validator participation, while overall market consolidation and reduced speculative momentum keep ATOM’s price within this stable range.
| Year | Potential Low | Average Price | Potential High |
| 2026 | $6.02 | $7.00 | $7.76 |
| Year | Potential Low ($) | Average Price ($) | Potential High ($) |
| 2027 | $2.69 | $3.08 | $3.47 |
| 2028 | $6.41 | $7.26 | $8.11 |
| 2029 | $17.04 | $20.78 | $24.52 |
| 2030 | $7.62 | $8.90 | $10.18 |
| 2031 | $10.30 | $11.32 | $12.34 |
| 2032 | $16.07 | $18.20 | $20.33 |
The price of 1 Cosmos (ATOM) is expected to reach a minimum level of $2.69 in 2027, with a maximum of $3.47 and an average of $3.90. This forecast is fueled by the expansion of IBC-connected blockchains, rising DeFi integrations within the Cosmos ecosystem, and improved scalability through ongoing upgrades, supporting steady growth while market consolidation limits sharp breakouts.
The price of Cosmos (ATOM) is predicted to reach a minimum level of $5.67 in 2028, with a maximum of $6.52 and an average of $5.83. This projection is driven by increasing adoption of interchain solutions, stronger validator participation, and the expansion of cross-chain DeFi projects, which enhance network utility and long-term token value.
The price of Cosmos (ATOM) is predicted to reach a minimum of $7.93 in 2029, a maximum of $9.68, and an average trading price of $8.22. This anticipated rise is supported by broader adoption of interchain communication, expansion of Cosmos-based projects, and institutional interest in interoperable blockchain infrastructure, driving sustained demand and ecosystem growth.
The Cosmos price is forecast to reach a low of $11.54 in 2030. According to the findings, the ATOM price could reach a maximum of $13.87, with an average forecast price of $11.95. This growth is expected as interchain adoption accelerates globally, with more blockchains leveraging Cosmos’s IBC technology and modular SDK framework, boosting utility and network value while institutional participation strengthens long-term demand.
The price of Cosmos (ATOM) is predicted to reach a minimum of $16.27 in 2031, a maximum of $20.31, and an average trading price of $16.86. This projection is driven by Cosmos’s evolution into a core hub for blockchain interoperability, which is expected to strengthen long-term ecosystem value and price stability.
According to Cosmos’ forecast and technical analysis, the price of Cosmos (ATOM) is expected to range from $23.19 to $27.90 in 2032, with an average of $24.03. This bullish outlook is supported by Cosmos’s full-scale interoperability, increased institutional adoption, and its position as a foundational layer for interconnected blockchains, driving sustained demand and long-term value appreciation.

| Firm Name | 2026 | 2027 |
| Coincodex | $1.86 | $1.65 |
| DigitalCoinPrice | $ 1.43 | $2.21 |
According to Cryptopolitan’s price prediction for Cosmos (ATOM) in 2026, the cryptocurrency is projected to trade between a potential high of $2.57.

Bank of Canada stablecoin regulations could arrive in mid or late 2027, pushing the detailed rulebook later into the same year that Canada’s government has already marked for its framework to take effect.
That timing lands just as Visa Canada and Wealthsimple are piloting USDC settlement for certain card-network obligations in Canada. The result is a live institutional use case in one part of the payment stack while the framework for non-bank stablecoin issuers remains unfinished.
A Reuters report said an early-2027 launch plan was ambitious and that regulations could instead be introduced by mid or late 2027. Canada’s own stablecoin framework already set a broader 2027 window, saying regulatory development was expected to continue for 12 to 18 months from early 2026 and that the framework would come into force in 2027.
The gap creates a planning problem for issuers and fintech partners. Firms considering Canadian exposure still need to prepare for registration, reserves, redemption mechanics, governance controls, risk management, and product economics around yield restrictions.
At the same time, payment networks and large fintech platforms can test stablecoin settlement for defined obligations before every issuer rule is final.
Visa Canada and Wealthsimple said their pilot lets Wealthsimple satisfy certain Visa Canada settlement obligations using USD Coin. The announcement described stablecoin settlement as coming to the Canadian market through Visa’s pilot and pointed to seven-day settlement availability.
The release also tied the Canada launch to treasury and liquidity management. Stablecoin settlement can give a fintech more flexibility around when obligations are met, how liquidity is positioned, and how treasury operations interact with existing payment infrastructure.
For a company such as Wealthsimple, which the release said serves more than 4 million Canadians and oversees more than $100 billion in assets under administration, those back-office mechanics can affect liquidity planning even when retail users never see the settlement rail.
The Canadian pilot extends a broader Visa strategy that CryptoSlate covered last week. Visa had already disclosed a stablecoin settlement pilot spanning nine blockchains and a $7 billion annualized settlement run rate.
The new Canada peg adds a named local partner and a specific settlement function to that global infrastructure story.
| Area | What is live or announced | What remains unresolved |
|---|---|---|
| Settlement | Wealthsimple can use USDC for certain Visa Canada settlement obligations. | The sourced announcement gives no Canada-specific settlement volume. |
| Issuer rules | Canada has published framework expectations for fiat-backed stablecoins. | Detailed regulations may arrive in mid or late 2027, according to Reuters. |
| Market scale | CryptoSlate market pages showed stablecoins at about $300.78 billion in sector market cap, with USDC around $78.31 billion. | Those figures show stablecoin scale rather than Canadian settlement demand. |
Visa Canada and Wealthsimple are describing a defined settlement pilot rather than a countrywide consumer rollout. The release says Wealthsimple can satisfy certain obligations with Visa Canada in USDC; the final Canadian issuer framework will decide a different set of questions around who can issue fiat-backed stablecoins into the Canadian market and under what conditions.
Canada’s framework is aimed at fiat-backed stablecoins issued by non-financial institutions. The government page says issuers would be supervised by the Bank of Canada and would face requirements including registration, one-to-one reserves in high-quality liquid assets, at-par redemption, governance controls, risk management, and a prohibition on offering interest or yield to holders.
Those requirements reach into the operating model. A non-bank issuer planning Canadian distribution has to design reserve composition, redemption channels, governance controls, and product terms around a ruleset that is still being drafted.
A move from early 2027 toward mid or late 2027 can shift when those decisions become binding and how much flexibility firms preserve while waiting for details.
The scope also keeps USDC relevant even though Canada’s framework is domestic. The government page says the framework applies to domestic and foreign issuers that make fiat-backed stablecoins available to Canadians directly or indirectly, and that it does not distinguish between Canadian-dollar-denominated and foreign-currency-denominated stablecoins.
For a USDC-denominated pilot, the final rules could shape how issuers think about Canadian availability, even if the Visa-Wealthsimple arrangement itself remains a defined settlement program.
Canada has already seen stablecoin compliance questions affect market access. CryptoSlate previously covered Circle’s Canada posture after USDC met Canadian virtual referenced crypto asset listing requirements, while the Bank of Canada framework would move that history into a more formal issuer regime.
The strongest signal now is whether Canada can align a formal issuer regime with payment-network pilots that are already proving stablecoins useful for settlement, treasury, and liquidity operations.
CryptoSlate market pages showed stablecoins with a combined sector market cap of about $300.78 billion, USDC at about $78.31 billion, and USDT at about $189.61 billion. Those figures give the policy debate its scale, while the Canada-specific question is how much institutional settlement activity develops before the issuer framework is fully detailed.
Two paths are plausible from here. In one, Canada finalizes rules in time for issuers and partners to plan 2027 launches around a clear registration and reserve regime, while settlement pilots remain limited but operationally useful.
In the other, detailed rules arrive later in 2027, and firms have to choose between waiting for certainty, building adaptable compliance systems, or keeping Canadian exposure inside partner-led arrangements.
Later, the Bank of Canada or the government will need to clarify how the mid- or late-2027 timing translates into publication of regulations, legal force, and practical compliance expectations. Until then, Canada has a live example of institutional USDC settlement and an unfinished issuer rulebook moving on different clocks.
The post Bank of Canada to bring stablecoin rules in 2027 with US Clarity Act on the brink of stalling appeared first on CryptoSlate.
Blockchain security firm CertiK projects that 2026 will close with 130 crypto wrench attacks and hundreds of millions in losses.
The projection comes as physical violence against digital asset holders continues to accelerate.
The firm recorded 34 verified incidents between January and April, a 41% year-over-year jump. The estimated losses reached roughly $101 million across ransom payments, frozen funds, and failed demands.
“The monthly breakdown shows 13 incidents in January (vs. 9 in January 2025), 5 in February (vs. 6), 10 in March (vs. 7), and 5 in April (vs. 2). The February dip reflects the delayed effect of large-scale police operations conducted across Europe in late January, before a sharp rebound in March,” the report read.
Follow us on X to get the latest news as it happens
Europe accounted for 28 of the 34 attacks, up sharply from 39.5% of the 2025 total. France alone logged 24 cases in four months, exceeding the 20 recorded throughout last year.
Officials at the French Interior Ministry confirmed 41 incidents linked to physical attack have occurred since January, roughly one every 2.5 days. Meanwhile, all other regions declined, with North America falling from 9 to 3 and Asia from 25 to 2.
Attackers historically required physical surveillance to identify targets. CertiK now attributes France’s surge to the presence of several flagship industry companies, sensitive data breaches, and a culture of public wealth disclosure.
CertiK said that as wallet and protocol security tighten, attackers are migrating toward the human layer of the crypto economy.
“As long as crypto-asset holdings remain associated with identifiable financial data, physical coercion will remain the economically most rational attack path,” it added.
Subscribe to our YouTube channel to watch leaders and journalists provide expert insights
The post Crypto Wrench Attacks Could Reach Record High in 2026, CertiK Projects appeared first on BeInCrypto.
MegaETH Foundation shared on X on May 7 that it had completed its first token buyback, using all net rewards accrued from the USDm stablecoin issuer through the end of April.
The foundation behind high-performance Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain MegaETH stated that the supply of USDm, its synthetic stablecoin that it created in partnership with Ethena, is now $480 million.
The buyback mechanism is funded by yield from USDm.
Apart from confirming its first buyback, the Foundation stated that future buybacks will be programmatic and on-chain. It stated that its reasons for that structure were to prevent discretionary decisions, to support MegaETH’s own markets and use MegaETH’s own chain, rather than routing capital through external venues.
The foundation also put out a disclaimer that USDm is neither issued nor operated by it and MegaLabs. The buybacks are also going to vary, as the foundation stated that “funds available for buybacks are unlikely to be the same each period. USDm supply rises and falls, and reward share is impacted by prevailing rates of return on underlying reserve assets.”
As of May 1, Aave announced that it had crossed $575 million in deposits on MegaETH.
Aave crossed $575 million deposits on @megaeth. pic.twitter.com/jc5uSnVFq2
— Aave (@aave) May 1, 2026
Aave was one of the major DeFi protocols deployed at MegaETH’s mainnet launch in February, and its TVL trajectory speaks to the activity base generating the yield that will flow into future buybacks.
The success of token buybacks has always depended on their execution and context. The clearest proof of concept to date is Hyperliquid, which led all protocols in 2025 buyback activity. According to reports, it spent approximately $645 million repurchasing HYPE tokens through its Assistance Fund, representing 46% of total buyback spending across the entire industry as of October 2025. The protocol reportedly routes 97 to 99% of its trading fees into buybacks and permanent burns.
On the other hand, Pump.fun’s experience tells a different story. The Solana-based meme coin launchpad allocated 100% of revenue to PUMP buybacks for nine months after launch. However, despite the burning and repurchases, the token traded roughly 81% below its all-time high and spent most of 2026 near record lows.
In late April, the team acknowledged the disconnect and pivoted its model, stating that it had burnt approximately $370 million worth of bought-back PUMP, about 36% of its circulating supply, and is now redirecting 50% of future revenue to operations, with the remaining half going to a new programmatic buyback-and-burn mechanism.
The future of $PUMP
We have burned ALL bought back $PUMP tokens, around $370M worth of purchases (~36% of circulating supply), to gain trust with our community.
On top of that, we have initiated a programmatic buyback *and burn* scheme at 50% of revenue for the next year to…
— Pump.fun (@Pumpfun) April 28, 2026
MegaETH is positioning itself closer to the Hyperliquid end of the spectrum than the Pump.fun end.
Its focus on programmatic and on-chain execution, rather than Foundation discretion or one-off gestures, is a deliberate design choice and one that aligns with the direction token buyback programs have moved following blowback that usually follows projects that took opaque approaches.
MegaETH’s native token, MEGA, rose by over 8% after 24 hours following the announcement, trading at $0.130. However, it is currently trading at 0.122.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It’s free.
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission may be preparing for its biggest crypto policy shift in years after Chairman Paul Atkins called for formal rulemaking aimed at decentralized finance platforms and blockchain-based trading systems.
Speaking Friday at the Special Competitive Studies Project AI+ Expo in Washington, Atkins said existing securities rules were written for traditional financial intermediaries and no longer cleanly apply to modern on-chain systems that can execute trading, settlement, liquidity routing, and collateral management through software.
“Software applications today do not always organize themselves neatly along these categorical lines,” Atkins said in remarks published by the SEC.
Atkins said the SEC should revisit how legal definitions such as “exchange,” “broker,” and “clearing agency” apply to blockchain protocols through a formal notice-and-comment process.
The remarks are being viewed across the crypto industry as a meaningful break from the SEC’s approach under former Chair Gary Gensler, whose tenure was defined largely by enforcement actions against token issuers, exchanges, and DeFi projects.
Rather than arguing that existing rules already cover nearly every crypto activity, Atkins appears to be signaling that some parts of decentralized finance may require new regulatory treatment altogether.
He also identified crypto vaults, on-chain applications that allow users to earn passive yield, as another area where the agency intends to provide more clarity.
Atkins said the commission should use exemptive authority “where necessary and prudent” while opening the process to participation from “innovators, investors, and the public alike.”
Even though the proposals are coming from Washington, their impact could extend far beyond the United States.
Many of the largest crypto exchanges and decentralized protocols rely heavily on U.S. dollar liquidity, American venture funding, institutional counterparties, or access to U.S.-linked banking infrastructure. As a result, SEC guidance often becomes an informal global standard, even for projects headquartered overseas.
That pattern was already visible earlier this year when the SEC and Commodity Futures Trading Commission introduced a joint framework categorizing digital assets into groups such as digital commodities, stablecoins, digital collectibles, and digital securities.
Reuters reported the framework followed years of lobbying from the crypto sector for clearer rules.
Regulators in Europe, Singapore, and the United Arab Emirates have also been moving toward more structured crypto oversight, though their approaches differ. The European Union’s MiCA framework separates digital assets into multiple regulatory categories, while Singapore and Dubai have created licensing systems specifically for crypto trading, custody, and token issuance.
Lawyers and compliance advisers say the SEC’s eventual definitions for on-chain trading systems could influence how global platforms structure products, user access, and compliance operations moving forward.
That matters particularly for decentralized finance protocols, many of which process billions of dollars in trading activity every week while serving users across multiple jurisdictions simultaneously.
Atkins compared the current moment to the rise of electronic trading systems in the late 1990s. He pointed to Regulation ATS, which allowed alternative electronic trading venues to operate without registering as full national securities exchanges.
“The SEC will keep moving forward in its work to accommodate markets moving onchain,” Atkins said, according to Bankless.
The response from crypto industry groups was largely supportive, reflecting growing optimism that the SEC may be moving toward a more collaborative relationship with digital asset firms.
The DeFi Education Fund described Atkins’ comments as “powerful” in a post on X.
Powerful statement from @SECPaulSAtkins today. In his remarks, the Chairman explains that “our existing framework” does not always organize “neatly” to today’s onchain markets. AND, he commits to providing a future-proof framework to clarify how existing regulatory definitions… pic.twitter.com/MBWOPsnAc4
— DeFi Education Fund (@fund_defi) May 8, 2026
The Hyperliquid Policy Center said it welcomed a chairman “willing to map these systems to existing legal frameworks on their own terms, rather than force them into legacy categories built for legacy architecture.”
The comments also follow a recent SEC staff statement indicating that DeFi wallet interfaces generally would not be treated as brokers, a move widely seen as reducing regulatory pressure on developers building decentralized applications and trading interfaces.
Congress, meanwhile, remains divided over broader crypto legislation, including the proposed CLARITY Act. That legislative gridlock could leave the SEC’s own rulemaking process as the fastest path toward a workable regulatory framework for decentralized markets.
The agency has not announced a timeline for releasing proposed rules. However, Atkins previously told Reuters that the SEC planned to release a crypto safe harbor proposal for public comment “in the coming weeks” as of March 2026.
There’s a middle ground between leaving money in the bank and rolling the dice in crypto. Start with this free video on decentralized finance.
A $1.75 trillion IPO is about to redefine which space stocks to watch this summer. SpaceX is closing in on the largest IPO ever. The public S-1 is due late May, with the listing slated for late June or early July.
When SpaceX publishes real launch costs and Starlink economics, the entire sector gets repriced against the same yardstick. Three names stand out as the cleanest read-through points.
Rocket Lab Corporation (RKLB) is the closest public comparison to SpaceX, building launch vehicles, spacecraft, and components in-house. The SpaceX IPO matters here.
The S-1 is the SEC document required before going public. SpaceX filed confidentially on April 1, with the public version due late May.
When it lands, SpaceX’s launch revenue, costs, and Starlink margins go on display for the first time. RKLB is the only publicly traded company doing similar work. When investors see SpaceX’s real numbers, RKLB gets repriced against them.
Want more insights like this? Sign up for Editor Harsh Notariya’s Daily Newsletter here.
Fundamentals look strong. Q1 revenue hit $200.3 million (+63.5% YoY), backlog reached $2.2 billion, and liquidity exceeded $2 billion.
The stock fell 7.17% to $78.58 anyway, as profit-taking on a 240% YoY run outweighed a Q2 guidance beat.
RKLB sits inside a rising channel that has held since late November. The recent top was rejected at $94.40 (0.618 Fibonacci). Price hugs the 20-day exponential moving average (EMA) at $78.96.
EMAs weight recent prices most heavily, while the 50-day EMA sits at $75.52.
The last clean break of the 20-day EMA on March 26 produced a 19.31% slide. A repeat opens $70.71, then $62.45 (200-day EMA), then $56.08 (channel floor).
Options lean the other way. The volume put-call ratio sits at 0.53 versus 0.73 at the last -$0.07 print. Open interest holds at 0.77. Traders buy calls into the IPO window despite the miss.
A reclaim of $87.08 opens $94.40 and the breakout zone above $104.81.
Among space stocks to watch, RKLB sets up the cleanest move into the SpaceX listing.
AST SpaceMobile, Inc. (ASTS) builds the only US satellite network that connects directly to standard smartphones. AT&T, Verizon, and FirstNet are anchor partners.
That positioning maps to the part of SpaceX nobody can price yet: Starlink direct-to-cell. When SpaceX’s S-1 publishes Starlink’s subscriber count and revenue per customer, the market gets its first benchmark for ASTS.
BlueBird 7, one of ASTS’s direct-to-cell satellites, failed to reach orbit on April 20. The miss puts the 45-satellite year-end target at risk. ASTS announced a mid-June Falcon 9 launch for BlueBird 8-10, set to overlap with the SpaceX roadshow week.
ASTS closed at $65.35 on May 7, down 7.54%, with earnings due Monday after close.
ASTS has fallen 51.27% from its February 2 high of $129.78. Current support is $63.25. Above price, the 200-day EMA sits at $73.53, the 20-day at $76.20, and the 50/100-day cluster sits at $82.40-$82.50.
Two bearish crossovers loom. The 50-day EMA is closing in on the 100-day, and the 20-day EMA is closing in on the 200-day. A break of $63.25 opens $58.40, then $45.95.
Options lean the other way. The volume put-call ratio dropped from 0.62 to 0.45 since early April, while open interest fell from 0.49 to 0.42. With earnings on Monday and implied volatility at 112.55%, traders bet on a positive surprise.
For ASTS to reset the trend, it needs to reclaim $68.17, $81.90, and $82.40. A move above $104.12 invalidates the bearishness. Among space stocks to watch, ASTS is the higher-risk pick into the SpaceX listing.
Intuitive Machines, Inc. (LUNR) builds lunar landers and runs NASA’s Near Space Network, sharing the Artemis program with SpaceX.
The SpaceX IPO angle here is profitability. LUNR is the only listed pure-play stock guiding to positive adjusted EBITDA in 2026. When SpaceX’s S-1 reveals Starlink’s profit economics, the market hunts for the next stock with that profile.
LUNR closed at $24.11 on May 7, down 8.43%. The company guides 2026 revenue of $900 million to $1 billion, almost 5x FY25, with positive adjusted EBITDA. Q1 results land on May 14.
LUNR has held a rising channel since mid-November. A breakout attempt failed on April 22, and the price has weakened since. The recent pullback pushed LUNR below the 20-day EMA at $24.92 on May 7.
The critical floor is $22.71, and the 50-day EMA is at $22.61, just below. Breaking those levels opens deeper losses. The first upside hurdle is $32.21 (0.618 Fibonacci). A clean break sets up a channel breakout.
The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) measures institutional inflows and outflows. CMF sits at -0.01, just below the zero line. April 1 set the precedent. CMF crossed zero alongside a 20-day EMA reclaim, and LUNR rallied 71.15% in days.
Earnings on May 14 are the trigger. A CMF cross with a 20-day EMA reclaim can replay April 1 into the SpaceX listing. Among space stocks to watch, LUNR offers the cleanest profitability story.
The post 3 Space Stocks To Watch Amid Elon Musk’s SpaceX IPO Hype appeared first on BeInCrypto.
GoMining launches GoBTC Pay a Bitcoin payment protocol that delivers on what the 2008 whitepaper promised: peer-to-peer electronic payments. GoBTC Pay enables free and instant Bitcoin payments on the core Bitcoin layer. This makes it practical to use Bitcoin at the point of sale for everyday purchases. Payments are free for end-users and merchants pay a small acquiring fee that undercuts traditional card processing.
GoBTC Pay is designed as an open infrastructure. GoMining operates the reference implementation, but any wallet provider — from Ledger to Trust Wallet to MetaMask — can integrate the protocol to offer instant Bitcoin payments to their users.
Bitcoin is the dominant cryptocurrency with a market cap above $1.5 trillion. Over 150 public companies hold BTC on their balance sheets. Spot Bitcoin ETFs, which didn’t exist two years ago, now manage roughly $100 billion in assets across a dozen funds. The U.S. government holds approximately 328,000 BTC. But Bitcoin still can’t process a retail transaction quickly and reliably.
The Lightning Network, introduced in 2018 to solve this problem, took seven years to reach $1 billion in monthly volume and its average transaction of $223 mostly reflects exchange-to-exchange flows, not someone paying for groceries. In the US, about 22% of adults own Bitcoin, yet there are only 2,300 U.S. businesses that accept Bitcoin directly, and the gap between how many people own Bitcoin and how many places accept it is widening.
“The first line of the Bitcoin whitepaper describes a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Bitcoin was designed to be money, not just an asset. That promise is still unfulfilled, and we intend to deliver on it,” said Mark Zalan, CEO of GoMining. “We already serve millions of users, and run data centers on three continents. All of this provides us a unique position to enable native Bitcoin payments with GoBTC Pay.”
GoBTC Pay enables free and instant payments in Bitcoin, using GoMining’s own mining infrastructure to confirm the transactions. It uses a 2-of-3 multi-signature architecture shared between the user, GoMining, and a regulated third-party custodian.
GoMining serves 5 million users globally. The company has created a dedicated mining pool for processing GoBTC Pay transactions, aiming for a 12-hour on-chain settlement by the end of 2026. Where most payment companies depend on third-party pools for confirmation, GoMining mines the blocks itself.
The pool also serves GoMining’s “digital miners” — users who own tokenized hashrate through GoMining’s app. A portion of GoBTC Pay transaction fees flows back to these miners as additional BTC yield: consumers pay with BTC, merchants earn BTC, miners earn a share of payment fees, and GoMining’s pool processes the transactions.
Any wallet provider, whether hardware, software, or custodial, can connect to the GoBTC Pay network and enable instant Bitcoin payments for their users.
For merchants, GoBTC Pay is a Bitcoin-native acquiring network that undercuts every major card processor on cost. Its acquiring fee of 0.2% is substantially lower than traditional card processing, which range from 1.5% to 3.5% in the US. On a $100 sale, the merchant keeps $99.80.
GoMining distributes the entire fee back into the ecosystem: half goes to the miners who confirm transactions, and half goes to the wallet provider that initiated the payment. GoMining retains nothing on third-party transactions to incentivize wallet integrations and accelerate adoption.
Merchants can receive BTC directly to their own wallet, or use GoMining’s custodial merchant solution, which offers yield on their BTC balance — including during the settlement window — and an off-ramp to fiat. GoBTC Pay will ship with a dedicated PoS terminal, a web merchant dashboard, a developer SDK, and plugins for Shopify and WooCommerce in the coming months.
The launch coincides with GoMining’s major expansion in the United States. The company is building combined data centers for Bitcoin mining and AI workloads, with a target of securing 1 GW of compute capacity in 2026.
GoMining presented a live demo of GoBTC Pay at Consensus Miami 2026 (May 5–7, Miami Beach Convention Center).
GoMining is an all-in-one Bitcoin ecosystem that makes it simple and secure to mine, earn, and use Bitcoin every day. GoMining serves 5 million users and ranks among the top-10 Bitcoin miners by hashrate globally, with data centers in the U.S. and internationally. The company makes Bitcoin accessible through tokenized hashrate, daily BTC rewards, and an expanding suite of payment and earning products. For more information, please visit https://gomining.com/
The post GoMining Launches GoBTC Pay to Bring Native Instant Payments to Bitcoin appeared first on BeInCrypto.
Privacy concerns tied to artificial intelligence may be one of the strongest cases yet for owning certain altcoins or cryptocurrencies. That was one argument Arthur Hayes made at Consensus 2026, where the BitMEX co-founder laid out a broad defense of the altcoin market and named the specific tokens he’s betting on.
Hayes said governments, major tech companies, and AI systems are becoming increasingly effective at tracking blockchain activity.
As those tools grow more powerful, he argued, more people will want financial tools that shield their transactions from outside eyes.
Zcash, a cryptocurrency built around transaction privacy, was singled out as one that stands to benefit. “There is a role for private cash on the internet,” Hayes said.
The remarks came during a broader conversation about the future of alternative cryptocurrencies — assets that have repeatedly faced waves of skepticism, especially after sharp market downturns.
Hayes pushed back against the idea that institutional money and tighter regulation will wipe out most of the market. His position was simple: altcoins will keep coming, and some will generate real, lasting value.
Arthur Hayes says altcoins will never die…
Respectfully…
Some of them absolutely need to
There are 10 million+ tokens fighting for the same liquidity.
At some point the market has to stop funding:
AI Inu Elon Pepe GPT 4.0The next alt season won’t save everything.… pic.twitter.com/pkx2C3jtt9
— MANDO CT
![]()
![]()
(@XMaximist) May 6, 2026
Of all the tokens Hayes discussed, Hyperliquid drew the most detailed attention. He described decentralized trading platforms as among the most consistently profitable models in crypto history, pointing to the wealth they’ve created for early participants.
Hyperliquid, in his view, represents the next step in that lineage — combining fast infrastructure with a token structure he finds genuinely attractive.
One feature Hayes highlighted: roughly 97% of the platform’s protocol revenue flows back to token holders through buybacks. He also pointed out that no portion of the token supply was set aside for venture capital investors — an arrangement that distinguishes it from many other projects.
The Stock Market Parallel Underpins His Case For Altcoins
Hayes compared the altcoin space to the broader stock market, where most companies ultimately fail but a handful go on to produce outsized returns.
Tokens, he said, should be thought of like software startups — high failure rate, but worth participating in because of what the winners can deliver.
Based on reports from the event, Hayes framed crypto markets as efficient environments for experimentation and capital formation, where new ideas can be tested and funded outside traditional financial systems.
Featured image from MetaAI, chart from TradingView
Strategy’s accumulation of Bitcoin and shift toward perpetual preferred stock financing could improve the company’s capital structure and share performance through the rest of 2026, regardless of proposed selling plans.
Michael Saylor posted “Buy more bitcoin than you sell” earlier on X, a pointed response after Strategy disclosed earlier this week that it would likely sell some Bitcoin to fund dividend obligations for the company.
Buy more bitcoin than you sell.
— Michael Saylor (@saylor) May 7, 2026
Strategy has purchased 145,834 Bitcoin worth roughly $11 billion since January, mostly bought while BTC traded below the company’s estimated average cost of around $75,000.
According to JPMorgan analysts led by managing director Nikolaos Panigirtzoglou, Strategy’s full-year purchases would reach approximately $30 billion, a figure that would exceed the roughly $22 billion the company spent on Bitcoin in each of the two prior years.
“Strategy appears to have re-accelerated its Bitcoin purchases in April, extending a 2026 pattern of increasingly opportunistic buying, responsive to both market conditions and financing availability,” the JPMorgan analysts wrote.
The company now holds 818,334 BTC, worth more than $65 billion at current prices, making it the largest corporate Bitcoin holder globally.
The second development with direct implications for MSTR shareholders is Strategy’s growing reliance on STRC, its perpetual preferred stock carrying an approximate 11.5% yield.
The STRC pivot carries obligations. The annual preferred share dividend burden runs at roughly 2.2% of its total Bitcoin holding value, or about $1.5 billion, according to TD Cowen’s estimates.
Saylor said earlier this week that the company would “probably” sell Bitcoin in the future to cover those payments, the first time the company has publicly acknowledged a scenario in which it becomes a net seller of any portion of its holdings.
His follow-up post on X, “Buy more bitcoin than you sell,” appeared to frame this as a net-positive equation. The company buys far more Bitcoin through STRC and equity issuance than it would ever need to sell for dividends.
TD Cowen analysts Lance Vitanza and Jonnathan Navarrete raised their price target on MSTR to $395 from $385 on Thursday, citing higher-than-expected capital efficiency from this financing shift.
That target implies more than 110% upside from Wednesday’s closing price of $186.82.
By issuing STRC instead of common equity, Strategy can buy Bitcoin with less dilution to existing MSTR holders. STRC’s outstanding face value now exceeds $8.5 billion.
TD Cowen raised its BTC Yield forecast for Strategy to 18.2% for fiscal 2026 (up from 16.7%) and to 9.6% for fiscal 2027 (up from 5.4%). The firm’s baseline scenario assumes Bitcoin reaches approximately $140,000 by year-end, with a bull case of $175,000.
JPMorgan noted that demand for Strategy shares among investors remains strong across both retail and institutional holders.
For the remaining quarters of the year, the key factors are remain if Strategy can maintain its current buying pace, and how the Bitcoin price moves relative to TD Cowen’s $140,000 baseline.
A stable premium and rising BTC price would add to MSTR’s leverage effect. A reduction in either would destabilize the STRC dividend math and narrow the gap between the $395 target and reality.
Don’t just read crypto news. Understand it. Subscribe to our newsletter. It’s free.