Bitget offers multiple custody options to capture institutional crypto allocations

• Nearly half of institutions adding crypto exposure cite infrastructure as reason, per Coinbase and EY-Parthenon survey of 351 firms.
• 55% of hedge funds held digital assets in 2025, up from 47% a year prior, with 71% planning to add positions.
• 61% of invested institutions already use multiple custodians; exchanges forcing single custody routes risk losing mandates.

• 47% Hedge fund crypto adoption in 2024, rising to 55% in 2025
• 61% Institutional firms using multiple custodians for risk reduction
• 71% Hedge funds planning to increase digital asset allocations ahead

The infrastructure bottleneck holding back institutional crypto adoption is shifting from what exchanges list to how they let capital enter, settle and exit. According to reporting by BeInCrypto, equity markets solved this problem decades ago by separating the broker who executes trades from the custodian who holds assets. Crypto exchanges are now racing to replicate that model, with Bitget positioning itself as a leader in offering multiple regulated custody routes and off-exchange settlement options rather than forcing clients into a single deposit-and-trade setup.

Off-Exchange Settlement Lets Institutions Trade Without Holding Assets on Exchange

Off-exchange settlement works by keeping a client’s assets with a regulated third-party custodian, such as Copper, Fireblocks or Sygnum, while the exchange treats a verified balance as trading credit. The custodian locks eligible collateral, reports the balance to the exchange, and the exchange allows the client to buy and sell against that credit line.

Profits and losses are netted at set intervals rather than instantly, reducing operational complexity and counterparty exposure at the venue level.

The appeal to institutions is stark: collateral never moves directly onto the exchange, cutting both direct venue risk and the operational burden of shuttling assets between multiple trading venues. A fund trading on several exchanges avoids moving collateral back and forth, cutting costs and settlement delays.

The model does not eliminate market risk, a losing position is still liquidated regardless of where collateral sits, but it does reduce the window during which an exchange holds client assets outright.

The custodian itself becomes a counterparty, however, creating a new concentration point between settlement cycles.

Bitget Supports Five Custody Routes as Institutions Spread Their Holdings

Bitget is one of the exchanges making that adjustment, building different custody lanes for different types of institutional capital. Regulated asset managers, subject to fiduciary and segregation rules, work with Bitget via partners like Sygnum and Komainu, a custody firm founded jointly by Nomura, CoinShares and Ledger. Market makers and quantitative traders, who need fast collateral redeployment across venues, use Copper ClearLoop. Bitget also lists Cactus Custody Oasis, Fireblocks Off Exchange, OSL MirrorEX and Bitfire PrimeMirror as further custody and settlement relationships.

The company frames this as a response to how institutions actually operate: 61% of invested firms already use more than one custodian, citing risk reduction. An exchange demanding a single custody route forces clients to abandon that diversification or walk away. Bitget positions custody as one layer of a broader institutional strategy that also spans settlement connectivity, trading liquidity, and capital management services. The company bundles these under its Universal Exchange strategy, which already spans crypto and tokenized traditional assets, a shift that changes how exchanges compete.

Custody Choice Becomes the Differentiator as Concentration Risk Spreads

Off-exchange settlement itself is no longer rare. Copper’s ClearLoop now connects several venues, including Coinbase International, Kraken MTF, and Deribit, and Fireblocks Off Exchange reaches many of the same exchanges. What differentiates exchanges now is breadth and regulation of custody routes offered. Bitget frames expanding ties with regulated custodians as a priority as it courts a wider range of institutional mandates.

This shift moves risk into fewer hands rather than dispersing it. A handful of custodians and settlement networks now sit beneath multiple exchanges at once, creating a new concentration point where a single outage could cascade across venues.

Hedge fund allocations to crypto are accelerating the urgency of this infrastructure debate. Just over half of traditional hedge funds held digital assets in 2025, up from 47% the year before, and 71% plan to add to those positions. Most allocations still sit below 2% of assets, but larger positions make custody, counterparty exposure and execution mechanics impossible to leave to chance.

The next test will be how increasingly interconnected custody and settlement models perform during market stress, when collateral redeployment and settlement windows tighten simultaneously.

The CCS read. We see institutional adoption now turning on infrastructure as much as price. Bitget’s multi-custodian approach addresses the real operational problem: large allocations need custody flexibility to build. The risk is that standardizing around a few settlement networks creates the same concentration Bitget is trying to solve. Institutions spreading their holdings across regulated custodians hedge exchange risk but bundle it into a smaller number of settlement chokepoints.

Watch whether other major exchanges match Bitget’s custody menu in the next quarter, and whether a market stress event tests the resilience of the emerging settlement layer. The competition for institutional mandates will hinge on how many regulated custody routes an exchange can connect without becoming operationally fragile.