Is Bitcoin Mining Still Profitable in 2026?
Is Bitcoin
Mining Still
Profitable
in 2026?
The honest answer depends on who you are, what you’re running, and what you’re paying for power. Here’s how to actually work it out.
Let’s skip the optimism and give you the real answer: Bitcoin mining in 2026 is profitable for some people and a money-losing grind for others — and the gap between those two outcomes comes down to a handful of variables most guides don’t bother to explain clearly.
The 2024 halving cut the block subsidy from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC. Bitcoin’s price hasn’t compensated fully. Network difficulty has kept climbing. The miners who were marginal at $90,000 are now operating at a loss or have shut down entirely. Those with access to sub-$0.04/kWh power and modern hardware are still making money. Everyone else is somewhere in between, doing math that changes every time the price ticks up or down.
This article is for the people doing that math — or thinking about starting.
THE THREE NUMBERS THAT DECIDE EVERYTHING
Bitcoin mining profitability isn’t mysterious. It collapses to three inputs: your hashrate (how much compute you have), your power cost (what you pay per kilowatt-hour), and the hashprice (the current market rate for that compute). Get these right and the rest is arithmetic.
The problem is that two of those three numbers move constantly. Hashprice shifts daily with Bitcoin’s spot price, network difficulty, and transaction fee volume. Power costs are fixed for operators with contracts but highly variable for anyone paying retail electricity rates. Your hashrate is the only number you fully control — and even that degrades as better hardware hits the market.
Hashprice: the number most people ignore
Most conversations about mining profitability focus on Bitcoin’s price. That’s the wrong frame. What actually determines your revenue is hashprice — the dollar value earned per unit of hashrate per day, typically measured in $/TH/day. Hashprice is a function of Bitcoin’s price, yes, but also of total network hashrate and current transaction fees.
You can have Bitcoin at $80,000 and a lower hashprice than you had at $60,000 if the network has grown significantly more competitive in the interim. This is exactly what happened in the months following the 2024 halving: price held, but difficulty kept rising, compressing hashprice to levels that made many operations uneconomical.
“A lot of market participants were on the edge of profitability already in the $90,000 range. So a lot of those operations are shut down or operating at minimum scale.”
— Filip Primec, Director of NiceHash AGWHO IS ACTUALLY PROFITABLE RIGHT NOW
The honest breakdown in 2026 looks like this. There are four distinct categories of miners, and they are having very different experiences.
Large-scale industrial operators
Long-term power contracts at $0.02–0.04/kWh, latest-gen ASICs, and treasury strategies that hedge against price volatility. These operations are still making money — but margins are thinner than 2021–2023.
Stranded or subsidized energy users
Operators co-located with cheap renewable generation — hydro, flared gas, solar — who effectively pay near-zero marginal cost for power. Their break-even is almost anywhere above $0.
Mid-tier home and small farm miners
Running S19 Pro or S21 hardware on $0.06–0.10/kWh power. Profitable when Bitcoin is above ~$75,000. Currently break-even or slightly negative. Holding on for higher prices.
Retail electricity miners
Anyone paying $0.12+/kWh — typical residential rates in the US, Europe, or Australia. At current hashprice levels, the electricity bill exceeds Bitcoin earned on almost any consumer hardware.
The dividing line runs almost entirely through power cost. Hardware matters — a newer S21 or M60 consumes less power per terahash than an S17 — but power cost has the steeper slope. Shaving $0.02/kWh off your electricity rate does more for profitability than upgrading hardware in most scenarios.
THE HALVING’S REAL EFFECT
Every four years, the Bitcoin protocol cuts the block subsidy in half. The logic behind this is foundational to Bitcoin’s design: predictable, disinflationary issuance toward a fixed 21 million supply cap. The economic effect on miners is more complicated than the headline number suggests.
The 2024 halving took block rewards from 6.25 BTC to 3.125 BTC. If nothing else changed, that would be a 50% revenue cut overnight. In practice, two things were supposed to compensate: a rising Bitcoin price (driven by post-halving supply shock and new ETF demand) and rising transaction fee revenue (driven by Ordinals, Runes, and overall on-chain activity).
The price rose — but not enough to fully compensate, and not before a significant period of margin compression. Transaction fees spiked during the halving week itself and then normalized. Network hashrate continued climbing through 2024 and into 2025, driven by machines ordered during the bull market that came online after the cut. The net result: hashprice spent most of 2025 well below pre-halving levels.
At $80,000 BTC and current difficulty: a miner running 100 TH/s of modern hardware earns roughly $8–12/day in BTC before electricity costs. Running at 3,000W, that’s $7.20/day at $0.10/kWh — leaving $0.80–$4.80 gross margin before hardware amortization. At $0.05/kWh, that margin improves to $4.40–$8.40. This is why power cost is everything.
THE CASE FOR MINING ANYWAY
The profitability calculation above treats mining as a pure income-generating activity. For a significant portion of miners, that’s not the right frame — and understanding why reveals something important about who actually keeps the Bitcoin network running.
Mining as cost-basis acquisition
If you intend to hold Bitcoin long-term, mining it is an alternative to buying it on an exchange. The question isn’t “am I making money mining?” — it’s “is my all-in cost per BTC lower through mining than through buying?” For miners with access to cheap power, the answer is often yes, even in compressed-margin environments.
Conviction-driven miners don’t quit in bear markets
The miners who have stayed in through every cycle are typically those who mine because they believe in Bitcoin’s long-term value, not because the current hashprice justifies it on a quarterly P&L. This is not irrational — it reflects a different time horizon and a different risk tolerance. Bitcoin was built to reward low time preference, as the saying goes.
The EasyMining case: A solo miner on NiceHash’s EasyMining product purchased a ~$70 hashrate package and found Block #939527, earning over $200,000 in BTC. The probability was extremely low. The outcome was real. On-demand hashrate marketplaces make this kind of participation possible without hardware ownership — changing the risk profile entirely for small-scale participants.
MINING WITHOUT HARDWARE: THE MARKETPLACE OPTION
One development that has meaningfully changed the accessibility calculation is the maturation of hashrate marketplaces — most prominently NiceHash. These platforms let buyers purchase raw hashrate on-demand, directing it to a pool of their choosing, without ever owning or operating hardware.
The economics are different from hardware ownership in important ways. There’s no capital locked in depreciating equipment. There’s no long-term power contract. You’re not exposed to the ASIC obsolescence cycle. You pay a small premium for that flexibility — buyers on NiceHash are currently paying roughly 3% above the hashprice benchmark — but you also get the ability to enter and exit positions as conditions change.
For someone curious about mining, wanting to experiment with pool strategies, or looking to occasionally rent large amounts of hashrate for a solo mining attempt, this is a fundamentally different risk profile than buying an ASIC. The learning curve exists — understanding pool mechanics, RTPPS vs FPPS payout structures, and how to read marketplace pricing takes time — but the financial exposure starts at around $100.
HOW TO EVALUATE IF MINING MAKES SENSE FOR YOU
Before running any hardware or placing any marketplace order, work through this framework honestly.
| Question | Threshold | Verdict |
|---|---|---|
| What’s my electricity cost? | Under $0.05/kWh | Favorable |
| What’s my electricity cost? | $0.05–0.09/kWh | Marginal |
| What’s my electricity cost? | Over $0.10/kWh | Unfavorable |
| Am I buying hardware? | Latest-gen ASIC (S21, M60+) | Competitive |
| Am I buying hardware? | Previous-gen (S19, M30) | Marginal |
| Time horizon? | Holding mined BTC 2+ years | Changes the math |
| Time horizon? | Need immediate fiat return | Risky |
| Want to try without hardware? | NiceHash marketplace from ~$100 | Low barrier |
The honest answer to “is it profitable?” is: it depends on your power cost more than anything else, and your time horizon more than your hardware. Someone mining with cheap power and a multi-year hold thesis is in a different business than someone paying retail electricity and hoping to flip BTC for profit this quarter.
Know which one you are before you spend money on hardware or hashrate. The math will tell you the rest.
This article is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Mining profitability figures are estimates based on publicly available hashprice data as of April 2026 and will vary based on hardware, power costs, and market conditions.
